All sittings← 2007-02-052007-02-07 →
Tuesday, February 6, 2007 · sitting No. 104
Commons debates payday loan rules in criminal code bill
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on government orders debating Bill C-26, which would allow provinces to regulate payday loan interest rates under the Criminal Code. Mr. Tony Martin said the measure would protect vulnerable borrowers after banks withdrew from low-income neighbourhoods, while Ms. Peggy Nash noted rising poverty in Toronto had increased reliance on such lenders. Mr. Lloyd St. Amand questioned whether the bill would still permit excessive rates.
Question period featured exchanges on the environment in which Mr. Stéphane Dion accused the government of cancelling carbon credit markets and emission targets. Mr. John Baird replied that regulations on greenhouse gases and air pollutants were already under development and that earlier Liberal governments had failed to act.
Decided that day
- Bill advanced at first chamber stage
- Bill C-32 passed second reading
- One bill passed third reading
- Justice committee report adopted
- Bill C-31 passed
- Two proposed deletions from Bill C-31 rejected
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2007-02-06
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
National Defence
Mr. Jack Layton asked whether the Military Police Complaints Commission investigation into alleged mistreatment of Afghan prisoners would remain independent and public. Mr. Gordon O'Connor said multiple investigations were under way and that all reports would be released.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
Ms. Anita Neville said the minister had blamed victims rather than address the record number of first nations children in care. Mr. Jim Prentice replied that 9,000 children were involved, that $416 million was already spent and that an amendment to section 67 would allow complaints.
Read the exchangeTaxation
Mr. Gilles Duceppe asked whether the new equalization formula would include all ten provinces and 100 per cent of natural resource revenues. Mr. Jim Flaherty said details would appear in the coming budget after consultations with the provinces.
Read the exchangeAgriculture
Mr. Wayne Easter said Standard & Poor's had lowered the Canadian Wheat Board's rating because of government actions. Mr. Chuck Strahl said federal guarantees remained in place and that farmers would be given more choice.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the listed cuts and pivots to the election outcome.
Canadians chose to change their government.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states work is underway on regulations but gives no timeline for targets.
work is well under way to bring in regulations to regulate both greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal record and quotes Al Gore instead of addressing the concession request.
I think that was an excellent description of the previous Liberal government.
- deflectedGovernment PoliciesMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer lists government achievements rather than addressing the call for another election.
We are speaking loud and clear about our record.
- deflectedGovernment PoliciesMr. Michael Ignatieff (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer compares the current record favorably to the Liberals without engaging the contradiction claim.
in the last 12 months the government has accomplished more than the previous Liberal government accomplished in 13 long years.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defers any detail to the upcoming budget.
the member opposite will have to await the budget and the announcements in it
- deflectedTaxationMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general principles of jurisdiction and fiscal imbalance without addressing tax room transfer.
we respect provincial jurisdiction.
- deflectedTaxationMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer again defers specifics to the budget without committing on tax room.
We will be in a position to announce our proposed changes, from fiscal imbalance to fiscal balance, at budget time.
- answeredTaxationMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly assures no reduction in transfers and references existing mechanisms.
there is no intention to reduce transfers to the provinces.
- answeredNational DefenceJack Layton (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly assures no interference with any investigative process.
I assure the member that I do not interfere with, nor will ever interfere with, any investigative process.
- partly answeredNational DefenceJack Layton (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promises public reports but does not address the timeline or full National Defence disclosure.
any board of inquiry, any reports that come from the investigations will be made public.
- deflectedNational DefenceDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The response focuses on ongoing investigations without addressing the specific requests for reports or prior knowledge.
there are two investigations going on, and perhaps three investigations, to find out whether there is any truth to this allegation.
- deflectedNational DefenceDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The response defers entirely to investigations without answering prior awareness or specific actions planned.
there are two investigations, possibly three investigations, going on which will determine whether records have been adjusted or not.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The minister explains actions taken to evaluate the issue rather than accepting the status quo.
after I became the minister, this issue is one of the first on which I asked that an evaluation be conducted.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer corrects numbers and then questions the member's support for a Conservative initiative instead of addressing the call for action.
- deflectedChild CareMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). substantive question.The response highlights the universal child care benefit instead of addressing the condition for Quebec's withdrawal.
We immediately provided the universal child care benefit to families across the country, including in Quebec.
- partly answeredPost-Secondary EducationMr. Thierry St-Cyr (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Acknowledges agreement and intent to act but avoids specific funding promise or timeline.
There is a significant degree of agreement among the various governments in Canada that we must do more for post-secondary education in Canada, and we will.
- answeredAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.Confirms ongoing investigations and commitment to public results.
Whatever results we get from these investigations will be made public.
- deflectedAfghanistanMr. Claude Bachand (Bloc) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.Defends existing agreement and Red Cross praise instead of addressing the Netherlands comparison.
The president of the Red Cross said that we were doing outstanding work.
- partly answeredCanadian HeritageMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.Claims compliance and offers to check website but does not explain missing postings.
as I indicated in carrying out my ministerial duties, I followed all the Treasury Board guidelines appropriately.
- deflectedCanadian HeritageMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). rhetorical question.Ignores budget-cut suggestion and pivots to criticizing Liberals.
In fact, we do not want to be alluding to Liberals who previously did not cover personal expenses.
- misdirectedAgricultureWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Shifts from expense justification to attacking the opposition on ad scam.
is he going to take personal responsibility to pay back the ad scam money that his party ripped off?
- misdirectedAgricultureWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Ignores trip-value question and attacks Liberals on Wheat Board policy.
The Liberals are not listening to farmers now. They did not in the past and they will not in the future.
- answeredInfrastructureMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Affirms infrastructure commitments and references upcoming budget additions.
Budget 2007 will certainly have more to add to that important initiative.
- partly answeredInfrastructureMs. Peggy Nash (NDP) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.Mentions transit funding and municipal talks but ignores the call for a national urban strategy and housing plan.
We have committed $1.3 billion to public transit systems across this country.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Gary Merasty (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Ignores child welfare spending critique and pivots to justifying the minister's travel for pipeline meetings.
The meetings that I was engaged in in Washington related to both the Mackenzie Valley pipeline and the Alaska pipeline project
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Tina Keeper (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Avoids the specific spending and water funding accusations by listing general aboriginal budget totals.
the budget that the Conservative government put forward included $3.7 billion of additional expenditures in relation to aboriginal programs and services over two years.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Ignores the Challenger flight cost question and shifts to praising the government's foreign policy leadership.
Now we finally have a government and a minister that are showing leadership on the world stage, fighting for the Canadian values we believe in
- deflectedForeign AffairsMs. Yasmin Ratansi (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.Sidesteps the staffer flight expense by restating the government's stance on international representation.
our government makes no apology for standing up for Canada's interests on the world stage.
- partly answeredCanadian HeritageMr. Maka Kotto (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Notes government support for Canadian production and states work is underway but gives no timeline or specific action on Shaw and Vidéotron.
As I have reported to the House, I am getting fully informed. I am working on the issue and we will resolve it.
- partly answeredCanadian HeritageMr. Maka Kotto (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Cites a report on existing funding levels and endorses Quebec's move without stating any new federal commitment amount.
Existing levels of support available through the Canada Feature Film Fund are generally adequate but need to be awarded and allocated differently
- answeredForeign AffairsDan McTeague (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.Directly details ongoing embassy efforts and travel to secure access to the trial proceedings.
embassy officials are in daily contact and they are in fact en route to the province where Mr. Celil is being held to deal directly with court officials and secure access to court proceedings.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges the report and commits to working with provinces but provides no specific concrete actions.
we will move to work with the provincial governments to ensure that these important concerns are addressed.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The response repeats transparency points and avoids answering questions on provinces, mandate, or cover-up.
I am prepared to work with the provinces.
- partly answeredMexicoMaurizio Bevilacqua (Liberal) asked Helena Guergis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that investigations have been requested and will be pursued again during the visit.
He has requested very thorough, timely and transparent investigations on all outstanding cases.
- deflectedSeniorsMs. Chris Charlton (NDP) asked Monte Solberg (Conservative). loaded question.The response lists unrelated past measures for seniors and ignores the retroactive compensation question.
We have moved on a number of occasions. We are doing that again in Bill C-36 to help seniors
- misdirectedMinisterial Motor VehiclesRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Peter Van Loan (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to criticizing the opposition's past travel instead of addressing the Prime Minister's vehicle use.
I notice that the opposition House leader, on January 18, 2004, when he was a minister, and his staff used the Challenger to travel from Ottawa to Ottawa on a half-hour flight.