All sittings← 2006-11-272006-11-29 →
Tuesday, November 28, 2006 · sitting No. 88
Opposition motion on health wait times dominates Commons
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on an opposition motion moved by Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla that the Conservative government has broken its promise to reduce medical wait times and provide the necessary funding and resources under the First Ministers' accord on health care renewal. The motion remained before the House at the end of the allotted time after exchanges involving Conservative MP Steven Fletcher, NDP MP Olivia Chow and Conservative MP Rob Merrifield.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the long-gun registry, with Liberal MP Bill Graham pressing Public Safety Minister Lawrence Cannon on its daily use by police and its support from victims of the Dawson College shooting. Bloc Québécois Leader Gilles Duceppe and MP Paule Brunelle questioned Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon on whether the government's recognition of the Quebec nation is inclusive of all residents regardless of origin.
Decided that day
- Vote 1 for Senate programs passed
- Vote 10 for Natural Resources grants passed
- Motion criticizing broken government promise passed
- Bill second reading failed
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-11-28
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Treasury Board
Bloc MP Jean-Yves Laforest said the Treasury Board refused the Auditor General access to strategic documents on a Royal Lepage contract, contrary to practice since 1985; President of the Treasury Board John Baird replied that a new agreement now gives her the information she needs.
Read the exchangeCanadian Wheat Board
Liberal MP Wayne Easter asked Agriculture Minister Chuck Strahl to assure the House that Canadian Wheat Board officials could testify freely before the agriculture committee without fear of reprisal; Strahl said individual board members may speak their minds but the board itself should not spend farmers' money on political lobbying.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Liberal MP Pablo Rodriguez asked why Environment Minister Rona Ambrose failed to appear before the environment committee; Ambrose said she had asked to be invited and looked forward to attending at a new date.
Read the exchangeIncome Trusts
Conservative MP Garth Turner asked Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to allow income-trust investors a one-time writeoff of capital losses on their 2006 taxes; Flaherty said the suggestion would not be adopted.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
Conservative MP Gerald Keddy asked Indian Affairs Minister Jim Prentice about a Nova Scotia partnership employment agreement signed with the Nurses' Union and Trucking Human Resource Sector Council; Prentice said the agreements will help young aboriginal people obtain meaningful employment.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedFirearms RegistryBill Graham (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer congratulates the opposition and lists licensing measures without addressing the questions on rejecting facts or dismantling the registry.
Canada's new government of course is making gun control more effective.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryBill Graham (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer calls the registry ineffective and quotes an opposition member instead of addressing the will of Canadians or police use.
The fact of the matter, Mr. Speaker, is that the long gun registry set up by the previous government has been ineffective.
- partly answeredFirearms RegistryBill Graham (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer mentions ongoing consultations with provinces and stakeholders but does not address the Prime Minister meeting victims or listening to them.
in fact, in the interests of more effective gun control, the government is continuing to hold consultations with the provinces and territories.
- answeredFirearms RegistryMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly states that the Prime Minister instructed the minister to meet the victims and confirms meetings have occurred.
Yesterday, I saw a letter from the Prime Minister
- deflectedFirearms RegistryMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.The answer lists police officers opposing the registry instead of addressing the request for the Prime Minister to meet victims or change policy.
The former police chief in Toronto said that he does not support the long gun registry and says that it should be scrapped.
- deflectedQuebeckersMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses the vote outcome and national unity without confirming whether the nation includes all Quebeckers regardless of origin.
What is important in all this is that Canada remain united and that Quebeckers, regardless of which side—
- deflectedQuebeckersMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids defining the nation inclusively and instead makes a sarcastic remark about language and an opposition figure.
my hon. colleague has decided to put forward this, of course, and probably he went to see André Boisclair to see whether or not he was able to speak in English in this House.
- partly answeredQuebeckersMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states the definition includes all Quebeckers but pivots to referendums and unity without directly refuting ethnic nationalism.
it is a matter of a definition that includes all Quebeckers living in Quebec.
- deflectedQuebeckersMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates recognition within Canada without confirming the National Assembly definition.
We recognize that fact, but within Canada, within a united Canada.
- partly answeredHealthJack Layton (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Acknowledges the issue as ongoing but gives no specific action or timeline.
I would say to the hon. member that this is an ongoing exercise.
- deflectedHealthJack Layton (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Responds by questioning the asker's facts instead of addressing prioritization.
the hon. member should check his facts.
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Turns to attacking the asker's past vote and Liberals rather than the question.
I do not think I have to remind the member opposite that she voted against the long gun registry.
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Focuses on the member's changed position instead of the messages sent.
The member opposite has changed her vote and her position on this on more than one occasion.
- partly answeredFirearms RegistryMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Details the meeting and other suggestions but defends the position taken.
I met with the victims a number of weeks ago and with other people at Dawson College.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Avoids direct response by citing others who support alternative priorities.
I have already quoted a number of police authorities that agree the problem is not the long gun registry
- answeredFirearms RegistryMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.Clarifies the registration and check system they will maintain.
we want to stress that we are going to maintain a system that will list all the people who want to own restricted, banned and unregistered guns.
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer ignores the registry question entirely and attacks the Bloc's voting record instead.
yet the Bloc continues to vote against the dangerous offender bill. Why?
- partly answeredTreasury BoardMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the access issue by blaming the prior government and claiming a new agreement was signed.
The previous government, the Liberal government, refused access to information needed by the Auditor General to do her job.
- misdirectedTreasury BoardMr. Jean-Yves Laforest (Bloc) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the question as defamatory allegations without engaging the substance.
the Bloc is wrong to make defamatory allegations about Ms. Buckler.
- deflectedThe EconomyJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses the net debt goal but avoids any mention of pension funds.
the net debt is the balance of the liabilities with the resources of the country, and we are going to accomplish that by 2021.
- misdirectedThe EconomyJohn McKay (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to attacking Rae and the Liberals rather than addressing the debt figure.
I am not surprised to hear that sort of thing when I see that the former minister of finance of the party opposite is supporting a fellow named Rae, who increased the public debt in the province of Ontario 113%
- misdirectedFederal Accountability ActMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to attacking Bob Rae's campaign debt rather than addressing the loans loophole.
In fact, while he has raised $1 million, he is in hock up to $845,000.
- misdirectedFederal Accountability ActMr. Pat Martin (NDP) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal party and Bob Rae rather than addressing the question on leadership loans and amendments.
I think it is absolutely outrageous that Bob Rae continues his streak of waste and wild spending, going into debt by almost $1 million, and clearly trying to evade the important financial contribution limits.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates government goals on marketing choice instead of assuring no persecution of board members.
we are trying to get more marketing choice for farmers.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats that board members can speak personally but avoids tabling the letter or allowing open discussion.
I will repeat again that every single board member of the Canadian Wheat Board can, will and probably is busy right now promoting their personal point of view.
- partly answeredNatural ResourcesRoy Cullen (Liberal) asked Mr. Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer claims streamlining is underway but provides no specifics on actions taken after nine months.
The Minister of Natural Resources is streamlining things in a manner that is efficient and logical, and that is what will be delivered.
- misdirectedNatural ResourcesRoy Cullen (Liberal) asked Mr. Christian Paradis (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the previous Liberal government instead of addressing timelines for action on mining and electricity issues.
That party was in power for 13 years without getting anything done, with catastrophic results.
- partly answeredTransfer PaymentsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes provincial surpluses and upcoming budget plans but does not address forcing provinces into debt via fiscal imbalance.
We are on track to address them in the coming year in budget 2007.
- deflectedTransfer PaymentsMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to long-term funding plans from Advantage Canada without addressing the fiscal imbalance correction.
Part of the way to do that is to make sure, as we set out in "Advantage Canada", that we address the issues of stable long term funding
- partly answeredCanadian HeritageMr. Lloyd St. Amand (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer affirms support for museums and mentions a review but does not commit to restoring full funding.
We have committed to review the museums policy and we will do so.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). substantive question.The answer restates ongoing diplomatic efforts without addressing the timeline or envoy request.
We are keeping a watch and we are talking constantly to ensure that this Canadian citizen's rights are maintained.
- deflectedForeign AffairsMr. Wayne Marston (NDP) asked Mr. Deepak Obhrai (Conservative). loaded question.The response reiterates previous actions and assurances but ignores the call for personal commitment.
We have received assurances that this will not happen and that Mr. Celil's human rights are being looked after.
- partly answeredAirport SecurityMr. Ken Boshcoff (Liberal) asked Lawrence Cannon (Conservative). substantive question.The answer highlights general funding but defers on the specific airport issue without committing to action.
However, I will look into the specifics of what the hon. member is talking about in his home riding.
- misdirectedPrivilegeWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the concern by accusing the member of fabrication and shifts to criticizing the Wheat Board.
the member for Malpeque is making it up as he goes along.
- misdirectedPrivilegeRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The response avoids a direct assurance by noting the witness list and attacking the opposition.
This is simply political gamesmanship in a trough slopping manner over there.