All sittings← 2006-10-242006-10-26 →
Wednesday, October 25, 2006 · sitting No. 69
Commons advances budget bill amid clashes over cuts and decorum
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on government orders for the Budget Implementation Act 2006 No 2 which remained before the chamber at the end of the day.
In question period Liberal MP Bill Graham pressed the government on muzzling of officials and cuts to literacy court challenges and programs for women and minorities while Conservative ministers defended their accountability record and committee appearances.
NDP MP Jack Layton and others raised concerns over changes to Canadian Wheat Board voting rules and alleged gag orders on farmers.
Decided that day
- One bill read a second time and sent to Human Resources committee
- Aboriginal Affairs committee report adopted
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-10-25
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Decorum
Liberal MP Ralph Goodale called on Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay to withdraw and apologize for an alleged derogatory remark toward a female member last Thursday which MacKay denied making.
Read the exchangeAerospace Industry
Liberal MP Lucienne Robillard pressed Industry Minister Maxime Bernier on the absence of an aerospace policy and job losses at Bombardier while Bernier accused the previous Liberal government of inaction.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
Bloc Québécois MP Gilles Duceppe questioned why Canada opposed the UN declaration on indigenous rights ahead of the Quebec first nations socio-economic forum and Prime Minister Stephen Harper cited constitutional concerns.
Read the exchangeHealth
Bloc Québécois MP Nicole Demers challenged Health Minister Tony Clement over approval of breast implants citing company-provided data while Clement defended the science-based decision.
Read the exchangeManufacturing Sector
Bloc Québécois MP Paul Crête asked Industry Minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn for a strategy to halt manufacturing job losses in Quebec and Blackburn pointed to new regional economic tools.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedMinister of Public Works and Government ServicesBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper confirms the senator's role but sidesteps the muzzling accusation entirely.
Senator Fortier promised to represent the people of Montreal within cabinet for the duration of this Parliament.
- answeredGovernment ProgramsBill Graham (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Baird directly rebuts the muzzling claim by listing recent committee appearances by ministers and officials.
That is why my deputy minister, my assistant deputy minister and I all appeared before the government operations committee last week.
- misdirectedGovernment ProgramsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper ignores the contempt question and instead attacks the opposition's Senate actions.
I think the reason for these kinds of ridiculous questions is that the Leader of the Opposition would like to cover up what his friends over in the Senate are doing.
- deflectedAerospace IndustryLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Bernier criticizes the prior Liberal plan instead of addressing the timeline for an aerospace policy.
Four days before the last election was called, they announced a so-called plan to help the aerospace industry, but the plan was nothing but a political ploy to buy votes and to fool Canadians.
- deflectedAerospace IndustryLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The response highlights past Liberal failures rather than justifying current delays or cuts.
For 13 years it did nothing for the Montreal aerospace industry.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Harper directly explains the constitutional concerns with the UN declaration.
Our government has some concerns about the declaration mentioned by the Bloc Québécois leader, because several elements of it do not respect the Canadian Constitution.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper defends the review process without addressing the respect accusation.
Our government had reservations about certain sections of the agreement.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Prentice states confidence in contributing but offers no specific proposals.
I am quite confident that my colleagues and myself can make a significant contribution to the discussions on how to ensure the well-being of aboriginal peoples in Quebec.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The minister directly confirms his plan to attend the workshop before shifting to policy details.
I have every intention of going to Mashteuiatsh.
- partly answeredCanadian Wheat BoardJack Layton (NDP) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.The reply addresses the election rules but ignores the bullying allegation and free-fair commitment request.
We continue to listen to Canadian farmers.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to access-to-information and Senate criticism instead of addressing the requested free vote.
The unelected Liberal Senate took it out.
- misdirectedDecorumRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The minister denies making the gesture rather than withdrawing or apologizing for the reported remark.
- deflectedDecorumRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The reply invokes the Speaker's ruling to avoid any apology or further engagement with the evidence presented.
I think all members of the House should respect your ruling.
- deflectedDecorumMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer again cites the ruling and declares the matter closed without addressing the substance of the complaint.
Now the minister himself has addressed the matter, and that should end it.
- misdirectedDecorumMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The response lists unrelated government programs instead of dealing with the demand for an apology.
In fact, we ask every member in the House to stand with the government and, on behalf of women, work with our justice minister
- deflectedManufacturing SectorMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The minister lists existing regional funds without outlining any strategy to halt manufacturing job losses.
While the Bloc shouts and does nothing, we have implemented the tools to help the regions.
- misdirectedManufacturing SectorMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Promotes tax cuts and attacks the Bloc instead of addressing safeguards against social dumping.
That is what we did and that is what the Bloc Québécois will never be able to do, since it is eternally in opposition.
- partly answeredEconomic DevelopmentMr. Louis Plamondon (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.Describes new funding tools available but does not address a specific role in re-opening the plant.
In the past month, we have put in place six new tools to help regions in difficulty and regions with declining populations.
- deflectedEconomic DevelopmentMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.States the government's role is not to start businesses rather than addressing measures against social dumping.
our role is not to start up businesses, but to put in place tools to help entrepreneurs or people who want to start up or expand businesses.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentJohn Godfrey (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Highlights positive comments from the Lung Association without addressing the misrepresentation accusation.
It has said, in fact, that it is in favour of the clean air act to regulate indoor air because it is one of the largest health risks associated with lung cancer for non-smokers.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentJohn Godfrey (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Repeats her prior statement on the FCM without addressing the call for an apology.
I am happy to repeat exactly what I said, which was the opposition should listen to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities that said: Recent announcements signal that the present federal government is prepared to take a leadership role and develop an environmental plan capable of delivering tangible results.
- misdirectedCanadian Wheat BoardRaymond Simard (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Denies the gag order premise and shifts focus to attacking Liberals over the Senate.
However, that is not the real question. The big question today is why the unelected Senate voted to remove the right of farmers to access information and to access the Canadian Wheat Board.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardRaymond Simard (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.Discusses an upcoming task force report and again attacks the opposition instead of addressing a vote.
However, again, that is not the issue. The issue is this. Why do the Liberals not want western Canadian farmers to know what is going on at the Wheat Board?
- misdirectedHomelessnessMrs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Explains funding numbers but includes a personal attack on the member instead of clarifying the cut.
the one disadvantage that the hon. member has is that she does not understand government numbers because she will never be in government.
- deflectedHomelessnessMrs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer restates prior funding actions and attacks the previous government instead of addressing the cut or funding commitment.
However, we will not do it in the way of the government that bankrupted Ontario.
- partly answeredMinisterial ExpendituresDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms expenditures will be public soon but does not provide the requested tour cost details.
the expenditures will be made public very shortly.
- deflectedMinisterial ExpendituresDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer disputes the premise about one-time use but avoids confirming or detailing the specific color-change expenditure.
What the member said is wrong.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the disclosure and trip questions to attack the Liberal Party's agenda and the asker.
It actually wants to eliminate retroactive access to information.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to criticizing Liberal Senate actions and the Wheat Board instead of addressing the trip or disclosure.
What I want to know is why the Liberal Party of Canada here in the House of Commons is hiding behind the unelected Liberal Senate to do its dirty work to limit access to information for the first time in Canadian history.
- partly answeredHealthMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites scientific articles and experts but does not address the company-provided documents concern.
I mentioned yesterday that there are more than 2,500 scientific articles on this topic.
- deflectedHealthMs. Nicole Demers (Bloc) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes differing expert opinions and strict conditions but sidesteps the lack of independent researchers.
Obviously scientific experts do not all share the same opinion.
- answeredIntellectual PropertyBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the upcoming consultation and strategy timeline in response to the competitiveness question.
Following these consultations, we will have a new strategy that will become a reality in the next budget.
- deflectedInternational TradeMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to general trade discussions without addressing the auto policy or specific accusations.
we continue to have discussions on trade issues with Korea and with a number of other countries.
- partly answeredInternational TradeMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.The answer promises future consultations but sidesteps accusations about killing plans or past failures.
I am going to have consultations with the automobile sector this week.
- misdirectedCanada-U.S. RelationsMr. Omar Alghabra (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to criticizing the asker's party instead of addressing the ad or Prime Minister's actions.
I would ask the hon. member to perhaps cast his mind back to some of the attack ads that were run in the last election campaign by his party
- deflectedFisheries and OceansMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Loyola Hearn (Conservative). substantive question.The answer offers vague assurances and a quip without committing to action on trust agreements or corporatization.
- answeredPoints of OrderRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly agrees to table the requested quotes.
I would be happy to table the quotes I am using if that is what the member would like.
- answeredPoints of OrderJohn Godfrey (Liberal) asked Mr. John Williams (Conservative). substantive question.The answer raises a valid procedural point about official languages for the document.
I was wondering if the document that is going to be tabled is in both official languages because we can only accept it if it is in both official languages.
- misdirectedPrivilegeRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer dismisses the privilege claim and attacks the opposition's motives instead of engaging the substance.
they might want to get on and start helping us get through the crime package