All sittings← 2006-10-062006-10-17 →
Monday, October 16, 2006 · sitting No. 62
House advances hazardous materials bill amid softwood lumber clashes
The House spent the largest share of its sitting on second reading of Bill S-2 to amend the Hazardous Materials Information Review Act. Parliamentary secretary Steven Fletcher told members the changes would improve disclosure processes for workers and employers while protecting trade secrets. Opposition members including Ruby Dhalla and Brian Masse raised questions about enforcement and border procedures.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the softwood lumber agreement and related job losses in Quebec. Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Maxime Bernier defended the deal while Liberals Bill Graham and Lucienne Robillard accused the government of inaction and faulty explanations for mill closures.
Further exchanges in question period addressed literacy funding cuts and reports of possible CMHC privatization. Diane Finley rejected privatization claims and defended spending levels on literacy and housing programs.
Decided that day
- C-23 passed second reading
- S-211 advanced in first chamber
- motion on real income support passed
- amendment to main motion defeated
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-10-16
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Criminal Code
Rob Moore said Bill C-23 would modernize procedures including the use of fax machines and address internet luring of children.
Read the exchangeLiteracy
Bill Graham asked why the government had cut literacy programs in northern Manitoba, Nunavut and rural Quebec; Stephen Harper replied that more than $80 million would be spent over two years to ensure effective delivery.
Read the exchangeCanada-U.S. Border
Jack Layton asked the Prime Minister to halt live ammunition firing in the Great Lakes; Peter MacKay said exercises were suspended during consultations and that Canada had made its views known to the United States.
Read the exchangeCanadian Wheat Board
Wayne Easter called an order in council restricting directors a gag order that violated freedom of speech; Chuck Strahl replied that the order simply reaffirmed the board's own code of conduct against partisan use of resources.
Read the exchangeAdjournment Proceedings
Rodger Cuzner pressed the government to create a program for displaced older fish plant workers; Randy Kamp said the government was pursuing options with provincial and territorial partners.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedLiteracyBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates spending figures without addressing the accusation of targeted cuts to vulnerable groups.
The House will know that the government will spend over $80 million on literacy in the next two years.
- deflectedLiteracyBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer counters with spending facts and past Liberal record instead of addressing current program cuts.
The fact of the matter is that under the previous government, for 13 years, adult illiteracy went up.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer acknowledges industry challenges and points to budget measures but does not address the minister's specific blame on Quebec policies.
That is why the budget adopted by this Parliament includes funds for the forestry industry and for older workers.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.Answer highlights the new agreement and past Liberal inaction rather than addressing the minister's explanation for job losses.
We have settled the softwood lumber dispute, and we have put more than $5 billion Canadian back into industry pockets.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to criticizing 13 years of Liberal government instead of outlining current actions for affected Quebec regions.
Thirteen long years of corrupt Liberal government meant that the softwood lumber problem remained unresolved.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the agreement is insufficient and references upcoming budget plans for workers and industry.
It is not sufficient and that is why, in our budget, we have funding for the older workers and for the forestry industry.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer confirms intent to create an older workers program but does not address the call for immediate broad assistance.
We made a promise to have an older workers assistance program.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.Answer emphasizes resolving the dispute and opposition status of Bloc rather than addressing specific proposed measures.
we have resolved the softwood lumber dispute, which the Liberals failed to do in their 13 years of corrupt government and which the members of the Bloc Québécois will never be able to do.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer describes regional job losses without addressing government action on unemployment.
Fifteen of the nineteen sawmills in the region are closed.
- partly answeredCanada-U.S. BorderJack Layton (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explains treaty history and suspension but does not address how exercises improve safety.
- misdirectedCanada-U.S. BorderJack Layton (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner with sarcasm instead of stating a Canadian position on live fire.
the leader of the NDP was not listening and he has taken the usual approach of ready, fire, aim.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer criticizes the questioner and blames environmental standards rather than retracting or apologizing.
the member for Bourassa is never lacking for inflammatory words, always cut and dried and always rude.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer continues to attack the member's tone and pivots to general consultation needs without addressing the claim.
the member for Bourassa just carries on with his insults in the House of Commons.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the premise and accuses the member of wanting litigation instead of addressing environmentalist blame.
the hon. member perhaps is trying to suggest that the U.S. housing market has taken a severe downturn because of the softwood lumber agreement, which he knows is patent nonsense.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer defends cabinet colleagues and pivots to passing the agreement rather than committing to immediate support measures.
If the hon. member wants a support package for the softwood lumber industry, for the forestry industry, he should pass the softwood lumber agreement
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the Bloc's past actions and cites budget instead of justifying refusal to add new measures.
We have acted in six months, something that the Bloc Québécois, after 13 years, cannot do here.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.Answer quotes an attack on the Bloc leader instead of addressing the softwood lumber question.
When you are a party leader in Ottawa, in these troubled times, if you do not have a clear position on one of the most serious issues of the day, [such as the softwood lumber agreement, on which we ask him to take a clear position and to continue to vote in our favour], you are insignificant.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids specifics on Kyoto or oil industry targets by deferring to an unreleased plan.
ask the hon. member to wait for our plan to be released.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer again defers to a future plan without addressing the call for immediate action on melting glaciers.
I would ask the hon. member to wait for the plan to be released and work with us on it.
- answeredCanada Mortgage and Housing CorporationJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly denies any privatization plans for CMHC.
Reports to the contrary are simply untrue, false, erroneous, inaccurate and downright wrong.
- answeredCanada Mortgage and Housing CorporationJudy Sgro (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer again directly denies privatization and notes ongoing affordable housing funding.
CMHC will continue to provide over $2 billion in affordable housing assistance that will help 630,000 families right across this country.
- answeredCanada Mortgage and Housing CorporationMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats a clear denial of privatization plans.
we are not planning any privatization of CMHC.
- misdirectedCanada Mortgage and Housing CorporationMarlene Jennings (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer dismisses the question by mocking the opposition rather than confirming profit allocation.
if after a week of scouring the country listening to Canadians the best those members can come up with are four questions on a rumour that is utterly false, this government must be doing a pretty good job.
- answeredHousingMrs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly states there are no privatization plans for CMHC.
We will not have any plans to privatize CMHC.
- partly answeredHousingMrs. Irene Mathyssen (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Addresses spending levels but avoids any commitment on a national program or privatization.
That is why we are spending over $2 billion a year, through CMHC, on affordable housing.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the request to rescind the order and instead quotes the board's code of conduct.
Here is what the Canadian Wheat Board's own Code of Conduct says: --directors must remain impartial and retain the perception of impartiality in relation to their duties and responsibilities.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardWayne Easter (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Rejects the gag-order premise but does not address the ethics or accountability question.
there is nothing in the order in council that prevents individual directors from speaking out.
- misdirectedCanadian Wheat BoardRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). substantive question.Ignores the plebiscite request and instead attacks the previous minister about farmers going to jail.
while that member was the minister of agriculture, farmers went to jail for trying to market their own product, and we do not want to see that happen any more.
- deflectedCanadian Wheat BoardRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Chuck Strahl (Conservative). loaded question.Avoids the vote question by pivoting to a task force and past Crow-rate criticism.
he forgot to add to that list getting rid of the Crow rate.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Defends overall literacy spending but does not explain the specific program cuts.
That is why we are investing over $80 million in literacy.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Denies program cuts but shifts focus to administration versus programming without addressing the 30% reduction.
the government has not cut any program spending on women, none.
- deflectedInfrastructureNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Praises transit in general and cites editorials but never answers whether the Prime Minister approved the withholding or if other agreements are frozen.
I have been reading a significant amount on this.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the questioner's motives and proposals rather than addressing the softwood agreement or job losses.
It is about time the hon. member told this House and Canadians what he is really proposing.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer accuses the member of deception instead of addressing the court ruling or agreement details.
The truth is that member does not care, he is not responsible and he is promoting a deception on the Canadian people and the workers in the softwood lumber industry.
- deflectedInfrastructureNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer quotes an editorial attacking Liberals rather than confirming or denying the leak of the contract.
Turns out there are some people who favour secrecy, who are happy to keep the taxpayer in the dark, and not surprisingly they belong to the federal Liberal party -- the same party that when in power was hardly famous for openness and transparency.
- misdirectedPrivilegeMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked Mr. Pierre Poilievre (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses a different privilege question about a different member instead of the insults raised.
The member for Mississauga South has claimed that he was threatened, that he felt intimidated and that his right of free speech was infringed upon.