All sittings← 2006-09-252006-09-27 →
Tuesday, September 26, 2006 · sitting No. 53
Commons debates softwood lumber bill as opposition calls it a sellout
The House devoted nearly half its sitting to debate of the Softwood Lumber Products Export Charge Act, 2006 at second reading. NDP MP Catherine Bell said the measure was a sellout that returned only half the disputed duties to Canadian producers and could be terminated by the United States after 18 months. Conservative MP Colin Carrie replied that the agreement enjoyed support from major producing provinces and most of the industry and would bring stability to communities hit by mill closures.
Question period was dominated by exchanges over program reductions announced the previous day. Liberal Leader Bill Graham accused the government of targeting the vulnerable, while Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the measures eliminated waste and that all affected groups would retain substantial federal support. NDP and Bloc members pressed similar points on employment insurance surpluses and Status of Women funding.
Decided that day
- Bill C-354 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-09-26
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Border Service Officers
NDP MP Brian Masse objected to Liberal MP Derek Lee calling border officers “wimps,” and Conservative MP Russ Hiebert said the remark insulted officers who seize firearms daily while working unarmed.
Read the exchangeYouth
Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla said the government had cut the youth employment strategy that placed 50,000 students last summer; Minister Diane Finley replied that subsidies would now target only students facing real barriers rather than corporations that would hire anyway.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
Liberal MP Tina Keeper said the government had cut the First Nations and Inuit tobacco control program; Health Minister Tony Clement said overall aboriginal health spending had risen 12 per cent and that ineffective programs were being ended.
Read the exchangeRegional Development
Bloc MP Jean-Yves Roy asked why the Economic Development Agency for Quebec Regions had announced no new money despite an election promise of a Marshall plan; Minister Jean-Pierre Blackburn said three new programs using existing funds had been launched.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper addresses only one example while pivoting to general expenditure review and Liberal failures.
The government has reviewed government expenditures to ensure we get value for money and that we fulfill the commitments we made in the budget to reduce expenditures and bring the growth of expenditures under control.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper claims programs continue but shifts to attacking Liberal health cuts instead of addressing the listed eliminations.
When we have to control expenditures in this government, what we do not do is slash $25 billion from health care.
- misdirectedGovernment ProgramsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper ignores the cuts and instead attacks Liberal fiscal image and leadership convention spending.
Their only priority for government expenditures is obtaining more money for the Liberal leadership convention in Montreal.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Baird defends spending accountability but pivots to new investments without addressing the specific program cuts listed.
That is why this government in our budget has chosen to make new investments into health care, new investments into making communities safer, and new investments to ensure that we provide tax relief to seniors on pensions.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Baird affirms volunteer support then shifts to other priorities and quotes a Liberal on cuts without addressing the voluntary sector impacts.
but it is important that we look at the priorities of Canadian families, the priorities of health care, the priorities of ensuring that our communities are safe, the priorities of ensuring that there is really meaningful tax relief for senior citizens and working families throughout this country.
- partly answeredGovernment ProgramsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Harper states the government will not fund challenges to unconstitutional laws but does not address the Montfort or school closure examples.
We do not intend to pay Liberal lawyers to challenge unconstitutional laws.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Harper reiterates constitutional behavior and redirects to Quebec strength instead of addressing access to justice for minorities.
Well, they want a strong Quebec in a united Canada.
- answeredEmployment InsuranceMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Finley explains the new tribunal and actuarial process for setting EI rates based on claims rather than surpluses.
we have a new procedure in place with a tribunal, with an EI commissioner and actuarial advice that will set new EI rates based on expected claims.
- deflectedEmployment InsuranceMr. Pierre Paquette (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses general economic conditions rather than addressing the surplus or EI improvements.
We hope those claims are low because then we can reinvest in Canada.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The response claims increased spending without addressing the specific cuts mentioned.
the new spending that this government has introduced in all of those areas far dwarfs any reductions the government made yesterday.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Denies the premise and restates budget intentions without engaging the question.
the statements by the NDP leader are completely false.
- partly answeredStatus of WomenBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Clarifies the nature of the funding change but does not address the promise.
We are not making any cuts to women's programs.
- misdirectedStatus of WomenBelinda Stronach (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.Accuses the opposition of fearmongering instead of addressing the recommendation or agenda claim.
Despite their alarmist fearmongering and accusations never based on fact
- partly answeredYouthMs. Ruby Dhalla (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Explains the changes to the program without denying the funding adjustment.
the youth employment strategy has not been cut.
- deflectedOlder WorkersMr. Yves Lessard (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.Refers to a study rather than committing to a program.
we committed to a feasibility study on ways to help long term unemployed older workers over the long term.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMr. Paul Crête (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promotes the lumber agreement instead of addressing the requested assistance program.
Companies in Canada, Quebec and Beauce will be getting more money than they ever got under the previous government, because the previous government never reached an agreement with the Americans.
- misdirectedStatus of WomenMrs. Maria Mourani (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the premise by crediting voters rather than addressing the budget cuts.
I will reiterate that the women of Canada made their decision when they elected this new Conservative government and put it into power.
- partly answeredSocial HousingMr. Christian Ouellet (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer cites existing CMHC spending but does not address using surpluses or avoiding the cuts.
CMHC, through its mandate, spends over $2 billion each year on low income housing.
- deflectedHuman Resources and Social DevelopmentGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends current spending and attacks the prior government instead of explaining the literacy cuts.
What we are learning to do is refocus on the federal jurisdiction.
- deflectedHuman Resources and Social DevelopmentGeoff Regan (Liberal) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer lists other investments and blames the prior government rather than addressing restoration of literacy funding.
We are also investing a billion dollars in PSE infrastructure.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to constitutional spending without addressing the court challenges program elimination.
it is important that every taxpayer dollar is spent effectively, responsibly and accountably.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMr. Pablo Rodriguez (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to constitutional laws and other priorities instead of explaining the program cut.
Instead of giving grants out to Liberal Party lawyers, we think politicians should accept their responsibility and deal with any issues that are before Parliament to ensure they are constitutional.
- misdirectedGovernment SurplusMs. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (NDP) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer assumes an unrelated question about debt reduction and ignores the surplus consultation issue.
I am not sure what the question was.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsMr. Paul Dewar (NDP) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.Answer blames prior Liberal government for the contract rather than addressing current spending or program cuts.
That contract was signed and delivered by the former Liberal government.
- deflectedGovernment ProgramsJean Lapierre (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.Answer restates general priorities on accountability without addressing specific program cuts or Montreal's treatment.
our government announced in the Speech from the Throne that our priorities would include accountability, transparency and the efficient use of taxpayer money.
- misdirectedMinister of Public Works and Government ServicesJean Lapierre (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.Answer pivots to Senate reform and defends the minister instead of addressing the call for democratic legitimacy or a by-election.
I am glad the hon. member is now interested in Senate reform.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsMs. Tina Keeper (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer provides spending figures but does not address the specific cuts or third-world health conditions claim.
spending for aboriginal health care under the new Conservative government went up by 12% in budget 2006 to $1.985 billion
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Tina Keeper (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.Answer lists investments but avoids the question on why specific programs were cut and repeats that ineffective programs are not funded.
What we cannot do is spend money on programs that simply will not work.
- partly answeredRegional DevelopmentMr. Jean-Yves Roy (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer begins detailing new programs but is cut off before fully justifying the lack of new money or the Marshall plan promise.
We are announcing three programs.
- deflectedRegional DevelopmentMr. Michel Gauthier (Bloc) asked Jean-Pierre Blackburn (Conservative). loaded question.Answer emphasizes program design and reception without addressing the surplus or failure to deliver a Marshall plan.
it was important to me that the tools provided by the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec be responsive to business people's needs.
- misdirectedGovernment ProgramsJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer quotes the Liberal's past position instead of responding to the current cuts or fairness concerns.
That was the member for Markham—Unionville
- deflectedYouthMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). loaded question.The answer evades the specific question about the cut's impact by shifting to policy rationale and insulting the opposition.
We are going to help the kids who need it, not Liberal cronies.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Dennis Bevington (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). loaded question.The answer denies the premise but pivots to general spending increases without addressing the specific program cut mentioned.
Indeed, we have increased spending for our first nations communities and we will continue to do so, I am sure.
- misdirectedHousingJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer ignores the housing cuts entirely and instead attacks the questioner's GST record while feigning disappointment.
I am very disappointed that the member is not reflecting the warmth that I am extending to him in the new session.
- answeredPoints of OrderMr. Yvon Lévesque (Bloc) asked Mr. Christian Paradis (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses the procedural point by insisting the apology is owed to the House rather than the individual member.
This relates to the House and has nothing to do with the hon. member herself.