All sittings← 2006-06-202006-06-22 →
Wednesday, June 21, 2006 · sitting No. 45
Commons advances accountability bill amid Kelowna accord clashes
The House devoted the largest share of the sitting to the federal accountability act. Members approved amendments by unanimous consent, including one that adds bands under the Indian Act to the definition of government institutions.
Liberal MP Bill Graham challenged the government in question period over its refusal to honour the Kelowna accord. Conservative minister Jim Prentice replied that 13 weeks of Conservative action had already surpassed 13 years of Liberal inaction on drinking water, residential schools and northern housing.
Other exchanges saw Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe press the government on recognition of Quebec as a nation and NDP leader Jack Layton demand the resignation of the environment minister.
Decided that day
- Several amendments to Bill C-2 passed
- Other amendments to Bill C-2 failed
- Bills C-13, S-201, C-2, S-3 and S-202 advanced a stage
- Bills C-338 through C-342 introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-06-21
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Air-India
Conservative MP Nina Grewal welcomed the launch of the commission of inquiry into the 1985 bombing of Air-India flight 182 and said families deserve answers.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc said the proposed softwood deal would impose duties and export caps worse than the status quo. Minister David Emerson replied that provinces would be better off than under any alternative.
Read the exchangeNational Defence
Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh accused Industry Minister Maxime Bernier of compromising the integrity of military procurement by meeting secretly with Boeing and Lockheed Martin officials in Washington. Bernier said the meetings were routine discussions with industry stakeholders.
Read the exchangeFinance
Liberal MP John McCallum warned that Conservative plans to alter the Canada Pension Plan would jeopardize future pensions. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said the government wanted only to examine intergenerational equity.
Read the exchangeFisheries
Conservative MP Ed Fast noted that the previous government had planned to cut fisheries officers on the Fraser River. Minister Loyola Hearn said the government would spend $2.4 million to reverse that decision and add more officers.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Answer lists unrelated actions instead of addressing Kelowna accord commitment.
The government is proceeding with aboriginal people to address their priorities.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Answer continues listing spending items while ignoring the pledge to honour Kelowna.
The Liberals 13 year record is one that is appalling, shameful and devastating.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsBill Graham (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks Liberals on morality rather than responding to the $5 billion funding question.
we do not have any lessons in morality to learn from the Liberals.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Bernard Patry (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.Answer supplies budget figures but does not address renouncing the Kelowna signature.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Bernard Patry (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.Answer blames Liberal record instead of stating a concrete alternative plan.
Personally, I support another solution to the problems of aboriginal peoples because the Liberal solutions have been catastrophic for aboriginal health.
- deflectedVisit by the Prime Minister to Quebec CityMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer shifts to federalist celebration without addressing nation recognition.
You have also seen in the newspapers that the Prime Minister will be in Beauce to celebrate the Fête nationale with the people there, who are great federalists and believe in a proud Quebec in a united Canada.
- deflectedVisit by the Prime Minister to Quebec CityMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Michael Chong (Conservative). rhetorical question.Answer pivots to relevance of federalism instead of confirming nation status.
Our belief is that Quebec is stronger within a united Canada.
- deflectedGovernment PoliciesMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). loaded question.Answer cites five priorities without engaging the listed Quebec-specific concerns.
We have concentrated on the five priorities that we talked about in the last election.
- deflectedGovernment PoliciesMs. Paule Brunelle (Bloc) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer dismisses concerns without addressing any specific policy issues raised.
The hon. member should celebrate that this coming weekend.
- deflectedMinister of the EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to past Liberal record instead of addressing the minister's competence or resignation.
after 13 years of Liberal waste and mismanagement on all fronts, including the environment, this government is focused on accountability on all fronts
- answeredMinister of the EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the government's position on protecting sovereignty regardless of ice melt.
whether the ice melts or does not melt in the north, we will continue to protect our sovereignty.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberal Party's record instead of addressing the UN declaration decision.
that is a continuation of Liberal hypocrisy, empty promises and rhetoric.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Gary Merasty (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to criticizing Liberal history rather than responding on Métis priorities or Kelowna.
I will not stand in the House and take any lectures from the Liberals on aboriginal policy.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Todd Russell (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer redirects blame to Liberals instead of addressing consultation or the hydro project.
I think today we are actually talking about Liberal shame.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Tina Keeper (Liberal) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer avoids clarifying the procurement policy and pivots to general health outcomes.
we want to ensure that aboriginal Canadians wherever they live get the best health care from the best sources available with the best health outcomes.
- partly answeredSecurities IndustryMr. Yvan Loubier (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer discusses the concept of a common regulator but does not justify the plan or address constitutional jurisdiction.
the issue is as part of our economic federation whether it is in the best interests of Canadians across Canada to have one common securities regulator.
- answeredSecurities IndustryMr. Yvan Loubier (Bloc) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly rejects the bias premise and states the goal of protecting Canadian investors.
No, Mr. Speaker. I want to favour Canadians.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly explains the incompatibility with Canadian law and policy.
The proposed wording is incompatible with our Constitution, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, various Supreme Court decisions, the National Defence Act and federal policies on aboriginal land claims and self-government.
- answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly refutes the premise of a policy shift and lists specific legal inconsistencies.
The draft declaration has never been supported by any previous government of this country.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids addressing the leaked letter or industry revolt and instead asserts provincial support.
The so-called letter that is being referred to was an undated, unsigned letter.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses the export tax options but does not address NAFTA compliance or sovereignty concerns.
no regions would have to accept an export tax of that level.
- deflectedNational DefenceUjjal Dosanjh (Liberal) asked Maxime Bernier (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the secrecy and integrity concerns and instead describes routine meetings.
Those were very profitable meetings.
- misdirectedNational DefenceDenis Coderre (Liberal) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.The answer turns to general principles instead of addressing the specific procurement process concerns raised.
We will always, when we acquire equipment, have it sovereign, under our control, and we will manage the equipment.
- answeredNational DefenceMs. Alexa McDonough (NDP) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms Canada's non-participation in missile defence discussions.
Canada is in no way, shape or form embarking on any further discussions with the United States of America on ballistic missile defence.
- answeredNational DefenceMs. Dawn Black (NDP) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). loaded question.The answer directly denies any policy change on missile defence.
We have made no changes to the previous government's policy with respect to ballistic missile defence.
- deflectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer shifts to IMF praise and a future meeting instead of addressing tinkering.
The report the IMF did with respect to our budget and our efforts on the Canadian economy was quite complimentary last week.
- misdirectedFinanceJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the prior Liberal government rather than confirming no changes to CPP.
What we are not going to do, Mr. Speaker, is what members opposite did when they were the government, and that is to have these surprise surpluses
- answeredPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer confirms the 75:25 policy remains in place and will be honoured.
It is something that we recognize as important for the region and important for the country, and it is a policy that we are going to honour.
- misdirectedPublic Works and Government ServicesMr. Marcel Proulx (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's past support for the policy instead of addressing the tender process.
Now that he is on the opposition side, suddenly he has a backbone and is opposed to a policy that he was championing just a few months ago.
- deflectedCanada Post CorporationMr. Michel Guimond (Bloc) asked Mr. Brian Jean (Conservative). substantive question.The answer praises colleagues and claims promises kept without explaining action on the sorting centre.
They have fulfilled their election promise.
- misdirectedInfrastructureMr. Michel Guimond (Bloc) asked Mr. Brian Jean (Conservative). loaded question.The answer insults the asker and falsely claims the bridge is painted rather than addressing inaction.
I would seriously suggest that my colleague should read more newspapers because the bridge is built, it is painted and it is working fine.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsMr. Borys Wrzesnewskyj (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer addresses aid given but ignores the donors conference request.
Canada has proceeded with more than $35.1 million to the World Food Programme, WFP, to countries in East Africa and the Horn that have been affected by drought and food shortages.
- deflectedChinese CanadiansMs. Olivia Chow (NDP) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer promises an apology but sidesteps the specific request for compensation to descendants.
An apology will be made in the House and we will be addressing appropriate acknowledgement.
- deflectedVeterans AffairsMr. Peter Stoffer (NDP) asked Greg Thompson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses spending and reviews but avoids confirming the immediate extension of the VIP program for all widows.
In terms of the Department of Veterans Affairs, we will be spending an additional $350 million this year alone, which is $350 million more than the previous government.
- answeredForeign AffairsMr. Borys Wrzesnewskyj (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly addresses engagement by stating Canada's actions and ongoing involvement with the UN and partners.
Canada is, of course, engaged in this process.