All sittings← 2006-05-162006-05-18 →
Wednesday, May 17, 2006 · sitting No. 25
Commons debates Afghanistan mission extension for half the sitting
The House spent most of the day on a government motion to extend Canada's military and development role in Afghanistan until 2009. Prime Minister Stephen Harper told members the vote would cover an extension of existing commitments plus one new element, Canadian command of the International Security Assistance Force for one year. Opposition members questioned the short notice and limited information supplied before the evening vote.
Question period featured repeated exchanges on the government's refusal to implement the Kyoto protocol motion passed the previous day. Liberal MP Bill Graham and Bloc Québécois leader Gilles Duceppe pressed the Prime Minister to respect the will of the House, while Mr. Harper replied that his government would develop its own plan and take concrete action.
Decided that day
- Motion supporting Canada's commitment in Afghanistan passed
- Twenty private members' bills introduced
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-05-17
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Canadian Forces
Liberal leader Bill Graham expressed condolences after a Canadian soldier was killed in combat and asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper to comment. Mr. Harper confirmed the death of a female officer and said the incident underscored the courage of Canadian forces.
Read the exchangeGovernment Appointments
NDP leader Jack Layton asked why the Prime Minister would cancel the appointments commission after the House rejected his choice of Gwyn Morgan. Mr. Harper said Mr. Morgan and his team had been subjected to partisan treatment and no quality candidate would appear before the committee again.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
Liberal MP Ken Boshcoff said Canadian companies were forced to sue their own government after the Prime Minister abandoned a favourable NAFTA ruling. International Trade Minister David Emerson replied that the negotiated settlement would bring stability and end years of litigation.
Read the exchangeFirearms Registry
Bloc Québécois MP Serge Ménard asked Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day to reverse his decision to remove hunting rifles from the registry and to transfer management in Quebec to the Sûreté du Québec. Mr. Day said he would consult the provinces while maintaining registration of handguns and safety requirements.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- answeredCanadian ForcesBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.PM directly comments on the casualty and expresses the gravity of the loss.
These are always terrible tragedies.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Response restates election promises and criticizes prior government instead of addressing Kyoto compliance.
we intend to respect our election promises.
- misdirectedGovernment AccountabilityBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the opposition's record rather than addressing accountability concerns raised.
I can understand why the party opposite would not want to clean up the appointments process given the kind of scandals it ran when it was in office.
- deflectedNational DefenceStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Response claims prior agreement and accuses opposition of inconsistency instead of explaining the policy shift.
Now they are starting to complain.
- misdirectedNational DefenceStéphane Dion (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the Liberal Party's past decisions and demands support rather than clarifying the vote's purpose.
It is the duty of the Liberal Party to support our troops in this military campaign.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Response dismisses opposition as unable to govern and restates intent to act without committing to the motion.
it is easy for an opposition party that will never be in power to say that it is easy to vote for very complex matters without a plan.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer accuses Bloc of poll-driven inconsistency on Afghanistan instead of addressing Kyoto or past statements.
Independent nations need leaders, not pollsters.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Response attacks the questioner's motion and its economic impact on Quebec rather than addressing Kyoto commitment.
the critic for the environment should be embarrassed about the motion that he put before the House last week because it means for Quebec massive job losses
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the questioner's motives and references past Liberal failures instead of addressing the territorial approach or funding request.
If the member actually cared about the environment and the future of Quebeckers, he would be working with us for a sensible approach instead of putting forward a motion that means shutting down the Quebec economy and doing nothing for the environment.
- deflectedGovernment AppointmentsJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the appointee and criticizes the committee process but does not explain why the Prime Minister cancelled the commission after the vote.
Mr. Morgan, instead of having an examination of his credentials, was treated to a buffoonish show of partisan behaviour at the committee.
- misdirectedGovernment AppointmentsJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the NDP for inconsistent positions on Afghanistan rather than addressing whether the Prime Minister will respect the upcoming vote.
And yet today members of the NDP say they will vote against it, so maybe I will just wait a few days and we will get a different position from the NDP.
- partly answeredInternational AidKeith Martin (Liberal) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer provides overall Afghanistan aid figures but does not specify the amount allocated to Kandahar.
In the next two years, an additional $100 million will be allocated.
- deflectedInternational AidKeith Martin (Liberal) asked Josée Verner (Conservative). substantive question.The answer repeats the national total and states there is one Afghanistan but avoids giving a Kandahar-specific figure.
There are not two Afghanistans, there is but one.
- answeredAfghanistanMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly outlines the extension details and the single addition of ISAF command.
One addition is being made to the military mission: Canada is requesting general command of the International Security Assistance Force, which requires the deployment of a high-ranking general and subordinates for one year, probably in February 2008.
- misdirectedAfghanistanMs. Raymonde Folco (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer criticizes Liberals for potentially voting against the mission instead of addressing the adequacy of six hours of debate.
if any member of the Liberal Party wishes to vote against an extension or the completion of their mission, that is deplorable.
- deflectedAfghanistanMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Gordon O'Connor (Conservative). substantive question.The answer notes the committee's right to study but points to the agreed vote timing without committing to wait for recommendations.
We are having a vote tonight on Afghanistan, as agreed by all House leaders of all parties.
- deflectedAfghanistanMs. Francine Lalonde (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). rhetorical question.The answer ignores the quoted commitment and instead mocks the Bloc for changing positions.
Yesterday, the Bloc Québécois was in agreement with procedures for the debate and the vote.
- partly answeredFirearms RegistryMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer states that provinces will be consulted but does not directly address reversing the decision.
I can tell him that we are going to consult the provinces.
- answeredFirearms RegistryMr. Serge Ménard (Bloc) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly affirms that consultation with the Sûreté du Québec will occur as requested.
that is exactly what will happen.
- misdirectedSoftwood LumberMr. Ken Boshcoff (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the member personally instead of explaining the government's position on the NAFTA panel ruling.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMr. Ken Boshcoff (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts blame to lawyers and repeats talking points about the settlement rather than addressing the ongoing duties and lawsuits.
I think the lawyers were probably the ones who got him to ask the question.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer defends the settlement in general terms and accuses the opposition of partisanship instead of addressing the NAFTA panel timing.
Those hon. members, with their cheap partisan politics, are inviting us to go back into a trade war
- deflectedSoftwood LumberDominic LeBlanc (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer pivots to praising NAFTA and the minister's expertise while avoiding the $500 million claim and provincial threats.
I may not know much about partisan politics, but I think know a thing or two about softwood lumber.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the Liberals' record instead of addressing the minister's statements in Bonn or the call to recommit to targets.
the only people who have anything to be embarrassed about on this are the Liberals.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer attacks the questioner personally instead of addressing climate commitments or UN assistance.
it is too bad we used taxpayer dollars and hosted the member to come all the way to Bonn, and he comes back with this rhetoric.
- deflectedFirearms RegistryIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Answer shifts focus from editorial support for registry to unrelated police quotes and polls.
Quoting editorialists is one thing. How about quoting some of the chiefs of police?
- misdirectedFirearms RegistryIrwin Cotler (Liberal) asked Stockwell Day (Conservative). loaded question.Answer pivots to attacking the prior Liberal government rather than addressing abuse of Parliament claim.
talking about coming before Parliament, the Auditor General has tabled her report and it was an incredible indictment of that former government hiding the results and hiding the money.
- misdirectedAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer counters with Liberal patronage attacks instead of responding to ACOA hiring interference question.
As far as patronage appointments, this minister and this government will not take lessons from a party of pork that took it to new levels every day when it was in government.
- misdirectedAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyMr. Michael Savage (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). loaded question.Answer insults the critic and defends the appointee without addressing political interference in hiring.
let me answer my ineffective critic across the way.
- partly answeredCorrectional OfficersMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer acknowledges the issue and states meetings occurred but provides no timeline or commitment details.
I have already met with their union representatives twice and spoke to them on the phone twice.
- partly answeredCorrectional OfficersMrs. Carole Lavallée (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.Answer reiterates meetings and promises a future announcement without confirming action on pension or contract.
In my first 100 days in office, I have met with this union and spoken to its representatives four times in all.
- deflectedPay EquityMaria Minna (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.Answer avoids the Prime Minister's past statements and new legislation by blaming the previous government.
We do not need any lectures from the member opposite. The member opposite who sat in the government throughout all those years did absolutely nothing in this regard.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer attacks the opposition's past record instead of naming a minister to take responsibility.
We do not have to make any excuses but we will be part of the solution rather than the members opposite who have been part of the problem for the last 13 years.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMs. Jean Crowder (NDP) asked Tony Clement (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends past budget promises and notes the vote against them rather than committing to the Auditor General's recommendations.
I can tell the House that we intend to fulfill our promises that were based on budget 2006, promises to aboriginal Canadians from coast to coast to coast, which the hon. member and her caucus voted against.
- partly answeredBusiness of the HouseRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer outlines the legislative schedule but does not address whether the Prime Minister will table the cabinet document.
today the House will consider a motion by the Prime Minister of Canada supporting the extension of Canada's contribution to international efforts at reducing poverty, enhancing human rights and gender equality for all Afghan men, women and children.
- answeredPoint of OrderMauril Bélanger (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly responds to the point of order by agreeing to review the matter.
Mr. Speaker, I will take that under advisement and get back to the House.
- misdirectedPoint of OrderMr. Nathan Cullen (NDP) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.The answer defends the department and criticizes the member's press comments instead of addressing the request for withdrawal or apology.
I took offence to that, because Environment Canada employees and our department, I would say, are the people who care most about the department in this country.
- misdirectedPoint of OrderMr. Charlie Angus (NDP) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to resolving a prior unrelated point of order about a document rather than addressing the privilege claim regarding the minister's remarks.
I have had the opportunity to consult with the present Minister of Transport and he indicates to me that this was not the case.