All sittings← 2006-04-052006-04-07 →
Thursday, April 6, 2006 · sitting No. 4
Agriculture debate consumes third of commons sitting
The House spent the largest portion of its time in a committee of the whole take-note debate on agricultural issues. Prime Minister Stephen Harper told members that immediate action was required after years of Liberal inaction and that the first $750 million in aid cheques were already arriving. Opposition members pressed for further immediate measures and criticized the lack of long-term supports.
Debate also continued on the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne. Members from several parties recounted the effects of farm income decline, rising input costs and market access barriers on their constituents. Question period featured exchanges on child care funding, Kyoto protocol commitments and tax policy between Liberal and Conservative members.
From the Hansard record of the sitting. Full Hansard
No CPAC Question Period upload is on file for this day. CPAC’s channel goes back to December 2019.
Who held the floor · 2006-04-06
AI-rated The sitting score and the rating of each answer come from a language model reading Hansard. How the AI rates this
Other moments
Privilege
Liberal MP Tom Wappel raised two questions of privilege concerning restrictions on member access to officials during the election campaign and an alleged overzealous application of members' services rules on advertising.
Read the exchangeChild Care
Liberal MP Bill Graham asked why the government believed tax breaks to large corporations would create needed child care spaces; Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that the government would create 125,000 spaces over five years while providing a $1,200 annual allowance.
Read the exchangeThe Environment
Liberal MP Lucienne Robillard pressed the government on whether it would honour Kyoto commitments; Prime Minister Stephen Harper said previous targets had been missed and alternatives were under review.
Read the exchangeAboriginal Affairs
Bloc Québécois MP Marc Lemay asked whether the minister would implement the residential schools agreement immediately; Indian Affairs Minister Jim Prentice said a final agreement and court approval were still required.
Read the exchangeSoftwood Lumber
NDP MP Peter Julian asked what specific steps the government had taken to counter new U.S. tariffs on value-added products; International Trade Minister David Emerson said the issue had been raised at the highest levels.
Read the exchangeQuestion Period, exchange by exchange
AI-rated Each answer’s rating (answered, partly answered, deflected, answered something else) is a model’s reading of the exchange. How the AI rates this
- partly answeredChild CareBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer outlines a space-creation plan but pivots to criticizing the prior government instead of addressing corporate tax breaks.
In the meantime, we will be proceeding, within the next year, with the programs put in place by the previous government which have no child care space targets whatsoever.
- partly answeredChild CareBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer states the $1200 allowance and provincial cooperation but does not explain how corporate tax policy creates spaces.
We also have a plan to create places in day care centres.
- partly answeredChild CareBill Graham (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.Answer repeats the 125000-space target and allowance but again contrasts with the prior government rather than guaranteeing spaces.
as I said, the plan which we will put in place over the next year will target the creation of 125,000 spaces over the next five years.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer quotes a Liberal advisor instead of stating whether Kyoto commitments will be honoured.
I can quote Tom Axworthy, a Liberal Party advisor, who is proposing new policies for the party.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentLucienne Robillard (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer attacks the previous government's record and offers no confirmation on low-income home-efficiency program cuts.
the former government told the international community that it intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6%.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer concedes Kyoto targets are unrealistic yet claims the government will work toward emission reductions with the international community.
This government will work with the international community with a view to achieving these objectives.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Gilles Duceppe (Bloc) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer criticizes past spending without results and does not address a moratorium on agency funding cuts.
This government has no intention of spending taxpayers' money without achieving results.
- answeredThe EnvironmentMr. Bernard Bigras (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). loaded question.Answer directly explains that the review was started by the prior government and that ministers are now assessing the programs.
The climate change program review process was initiated by the previous government.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentMr. Serge Cardin (Bloc) asked Rona Ambrose (Conservative). substantive question.Answer begins politely but provides no information on Kyoto implementation.
Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member--
- answeredThe EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer explains the funding reallocation strategy to meet climate goals.
the way we are going to get toward a new climate change program is making sure we have the funds available, that the funds are taken from programs that are not working and not effective and are put toward those that will result in the reduction of greenhouse gases.
- partly answeredThe EnvironmentJack Layton (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.Answer agrees on past failure but offers no specific plan details.
This is why we are making policy and financial changes as we develop a new plan.
- deflectedTaxationJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). loaded question.Answer questions the premise with multiple number sets instead of addressing tax policy.
When the member opposite talks about taxes, I ask, increase taxes from where? Which of the five sets of numbers?
- answeredTaxationJohn McCallum (Liberal) asked Jim Flaherty (Conservative). substantive question.Answer commits to reducing taxes for all Canadians as promised.
We will reduce taxes for all Canadians so that all Canadians will bear less of a tax burden.
- answeredThe EnvironmentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer justifies cancellation by citing ineffective programs from prior review.
We are not going to fund programs that are ineffective and not in the interest of taxpayers.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentScott Brison (Liberal) asked Gary Lunn (Conservative). substantive question.Answer shifts to criticizing Liberal record and past spending instead of addressing current cuts.
As the Prime Minister said, after spending billions and billions of dollars, greenhouse gases have gone up 30% more than the Liberal targets.
- partly answeredArts and CultureMr. Maka Kotto (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.Answer affirms general support for arts but does not address doubling Canada Council funding.
We have committed to support them and to ensure that they will be able to sustain themselves and continue their contribution to Canadian life and to an improved Canadian perspective internationally.
- answeredArts and CultureMr. Maka Kotto (Bloc) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly affirms the economic and cultural benefits and commits to working with agencies.
We will be working with every agency that benefits our cultural community and Canada in the appropriate ways.
- deflectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer shifts to criticizing past Liberal inaction and drinking water instead of addressing the Kelowna agreement.
We need to work together. We must first address a tragedy resulting from twelve years of inaction during the Liberal era.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsMr. Marc Lemay (Bloc) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer acknowledges ongoing work toward a final agreement but does not commit to immediate implementation.
We are working now with the aboriginals and their lawyers. The current issue is the question of the final agreement.
- misdirectedThe EnvironmentNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer attacks the question as a bad joke rather than addressing the policy change.
the information in the member's question was as bad as his joke.
- deflectedThe EnvironmentNavdeep Bains (Liberal) asked Mr. James Moore (Conservative). loaded question.The answer dismisses the premise by telling the member to get facts straight without explaining the policy shift.
my colleague should get his facts straight.
- deflectedGovernment PoliciesHedy Fry (Liberal) asked David Emerson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer pivots to praising the election outcome and personal pride instead of confirming current policy alignment.
I am very proud to have been asked to serve in the cabinet of this new government.
- deflectedGovernment PoliciesHedy Fry (Liberal) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer reframes around moving past partisanship without clarifying the minister's earlier statements.
the government decided to look beyond the partisanship of the election campaign and form a government that reaches out to all Canadians.
- partly answeredCanada-U.S. BorderMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). loaded question.The answer confirms concerns were raised but does not state whether a counter-proposal was offered.
I certainly expressed to President Bush, and it was expressed to American officials by all Canadians present, that we believe this law is not in the interest of either of our countries
- deflectedCanada-U.S. BorderMr. Brian Masse (NDP) asked Stephen Harper (Conservative). substantive question.The answer mentions meetings but immediately pivots to attacking the NDP instead of outlining any plan.
In the meantime, I would be very interested in finding out how the NDP plans to force Americans to get passports.
- answeredGovernment ContractsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states that the contract was terminated once discovered.
The moment that my political staff and I learned of this contract, it was immediately terminated.
- deflectedGovernment ContractsMr. Mark Holland (Liberal) asked John Baird (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the timing question and instead attacks the questioner's understanding of accountability.
the member opposite obviously does not know what accountability looks like.
- partly answeredAboriginal AffairsAnita Neville (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). loaded question.The answer explains preconditions but does not address how many more deaths would prompt action.
The first was the preparation of a final agreement.
- misdirectedAboriginal AffairsMr. Gary Merasty (Liberal) asked Jim Prentice (Conservative). substantive question.The answer turns to criticizing the previous Liberal government rather than committing to new funding.
this government together with first nations dealt with it in exactly the way the member's government never did.
- partly answeredSocial HousingMr. Christian Ouellet (Bloc) asked Diane Finley (Conservative). substantive question.The answer addresses exploring options but provides no concrete plan or timeline for social housing.
We are exploring options for that.
- answeredAccountabilityMr. Benoît Sauvageau (Bloc) asked John Baird (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly confirms the government will include the requested measure.
I can tell him that the answer to his question is yes.
- answeredArts and CultureMauril Bélanger (Liberal) asked Bev Oda (Conservative). substantive question.The answer directly states the intent not to honor the prior commitment.
it is certainly not our intent to honour any Liberal commitment.
- partly answeredSoftwood LumberMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer states escalation occurred at high levels but gives no specifics on actions for the new tariffs or small businesses mentioned.
this Prime Minister has escalated this issue to the highest levels with the President of the United States.
- deflectedSoftwood LumberMr. Peter Julian (NDP) asked David Emerson (Conservative). loaded question.The answer avoids the specific $5 billion commitment by shifting to a general obligation across all companies and regions.
The Government of Canada has an obligation to the industry across this country.
- partly answeredForeign AffairsKeith Martin (Liberal) asked Peter MacKay (Conservative). substantive question.The answer discusses Canada's support for UN transition but does not address calling for a rapid reaction force as asked.
Canada has welcomed the recent African Union's decision to move into transition and put United Nations forces on the ground.
- misdirectedBusiness of the HouseRalph Goodale (Liberal) asked Rob Nicholson (Conservative). substantive question.The answer opens by attacking the questioner about past budget timing before providing partial schedule details.
Is that what he did as finance minister?