
Warren Steinley
Conservative · Regina—Lewvan, SK
Photo: Conservative Party of Canada
Loading the riding.
Biography
Warren Steinley is a Canadian politician, who was elected Member of Parliament for the riding of Regina—Lewvan in the 2019 Canadian federal election. He represents the riding of Regina—Lewvan in the House of Commons as a Member of the Conservative Party. encyclopedia
- Born
- 1982-04-27, Rush Lakeencyclopedia
- Languages
- Englishofficial
- Occupation before politics
- political adviser, politician, proprietorencyclopedia
Electoral history
Regina—Lewvan
Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28officialWarren Steinley21,988Mac HirdRunner-up · Liberal18,893Difference 3,095 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Regina--Lewvan.
Elections Canada, 45th general election.
Regina—Lewvan
Conservative · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27encyclopediaWarren Steinley21,375Tria DonaldsonRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party15,763Difference 5,612 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Regina--Lewvan.
Elections Canada, 44th general election.
Regina—Lewvan
Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19encyclopediaWarren Steinley27,088Jigar PatelRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party14,767Difference 12,321 votes. 5 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Regina--Lewvan.
Elections Canada, 43rd general election.
Education
Our sources do not list any education for this member.
Experience
Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.
In their own words
1,365 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.
Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to join in and ask for more with respect to the answer I received back in the previous session on affordability. I know my colleague from Whitby is going to respond to the question I am going to ask him. We have had a lot of good, partisan sparring b…Adjournment Proceedings — The Economy · 2026-09-24
Where they stand
Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.
A stored score on 10 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.
Agriculture
Defend supply management
The other end of this axis: Liberalize supply management
Criticizes CUSMA for going far beyond market access concessions on dairy and giving up sovereignty over Canada's supply management system.
By requiring the Canadian dairy sector to consult with the U.S. on any proposed changes to our system, the government has given up some sovereignty over our domestic and international decision-making. That is a problem for any industry, whether it is dairy, softwood, forestry or the auto industry.Source of that line
Energy
Expand production and export
The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas
repeated support for pipelines, oil and gas exports and Canadian energy
When we are trying to get our goods to market, in talking to the railways about the huge inefficiencies, another thing we could do is get some pipelines built. If we take some oil cars off the railways, then we would have the ability to actually ship more grain on a daily basis.Source of that line
Federalism
Provinces lead
The other end of this axis: Ottawa leads
criticizes federal pharmacare without provincial consultation and supports provincial health systems
I have been talking with our health minister in Saskatchewan. He still has no details about what this pharmacare pamphlet would look like or how it would affect the people of Saskatchewan. The biggest fear at the provincial level is that coverage would lessen in Saskatchewan.Source of that line
Financial regulation
Lighter capital rules and more competition
The other end of this axis: Tighter prudential rules
Advocates giving financial institutions discretion in lending programs like CEBA to help businesses.
If we gave the financial lending institutions a bit of discretion, it would solve a lot of problems. All we have to do is change a few words in the CEBA criteria to add “or at the lending institution's discretion”.Source of that line
Fiscal policy
Lower taxes and tighter spending
The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending
Criticizes carbon tax, high debt ceiling, and lack of balanced budget plan while supporting targeted relief.
Out of 700 pages, there is no plan to return to balance. There is no plan to actually stop stockpiling debt onto future generations of Canadians. That is where I want to start my presentation today, talking about the next generations of Canadians, what this budget would actually do and how it would set up their life.Source of that line
Health
More private delivery
The other end of this axis: Expand public coverage
opposes federal pharmacare expansion and criticizes past NDP cuts creating two-tier system
The biggest fear at the provincial level is that coverage would lessen in Saskatchewan. They have done a good job of building health care back up in Saskatchewan after the nineties, when the NDP ruined health care in Saskatchewan, which I will get to later in my speech.Source of that line
Immigration
Lower intake
The other end of this axis: Higher permanent intake
criticizes expanded birthright citizenship and queue-jumping in system under strain
How is that going to be regulated? Who is going to oversee it to make sure that criteria is met? We know that the immigration system is at a breaking point. In Regina—Lewvan, we have a very diverse community, and I would say that about 80% of the cases in our office have something to do with the IRCC.Source of that line
Labour
More flexibility for employers
The other end of this axis: Stronger unions and standards
Supports private sector projects like pipelines to create jobs and criticizes policies harming employment.
Madam Speaker, we have very similar ridings, so I think the best work program we could ever create is to unleash the private sector. The member has pipeline workers in his riding and I have pipeline workers in mine.Source of that line
Public safety
Enforcement and sentencing
The other end of this axis: Prevention and restraint
Emphasizes victims' rights and questions reduced sentences for crimes involving firearms or trafficking.
I just heard my colleague from across talk about a hammer and a nail, but what about the victims? What about the victim of a grocery store robbery where someone used a firearm and gets a lesser sentence? That victim then has to walk down the street and see the assailant all the time? Should we not take a bit of that into consideration during this debate and talk about the people who have the crimes perpetrated against them? I would like to have my colleague's comments on that.Source of that line
Trade
Deeper continental integration
The other end of this axis: Diversify away from one partner
supports trade continuity agreements and pipelines for exports
The United Kingdom is our fifth-largest trading partner and third-largest export market, with two-way trade between the U.K. and Canada worth $29 billion as of 2019. When the United Kingdom left the European Union on January 31, 2020, a transitional period lasting until December 31, 2020, went into effect.Source of that line
4 topics with no stored score
- ClimateNo position has been scored.
- DefenceNo position has been scored.
- Foreign affairsNo position has been scored.
- HousingNo position has been scored.
Who lines up
Comparing stored scores on the same questions.