Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
Portrait of Warren Steinley. Photo: Conservative Party of Canada

Warren Steinley

Conservative · Regina—Lewvan, SK

Sitting MPmale44

Photo: Conservative Party of Canada

Loading the riding.

Biography

Warren Steinley is a Canadian politician, who was elected Member of Parliament for the riding of Regina—Lewvan in the 2019 Canadian federal election. He represents the riding of Regina—Lewvan in the House of Commons as a Member of the Conservative Party. encyclopedia

Born
1982-04-27, Rush Lakeencyclopedia
Languages
Englishofficial
Occupation before politics
political adviser, politician, proprietorencyclopedia

Electoral history

  1. Regina—Lewvan

    Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28
    Warren Steinley21,988
    Mac HirdRunner-up · Liberal18,893

    Difference 3,095 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    On the official list the riding is Regina--Lewvan.

    Elections Canada, 45th general election.

    official
  2. Regina—Lewvan

    Conservative · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27
    Warren Steinley21,375
    Tria DonaldsonRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party15,763

    Difference 5,612 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    On the official list the riding is Regina--Lewvan.

    Elections Canada, 44th general election.

    encyclopedia
  3. Regina—Lewvan

    Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19
    Warren Steinley27,088
    Jigar PatelRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party14,767

    Difference 12,321 votes. 5 other candidates also ran.

    On the official list the riding is Regina--Lewvan.

    Elections Canada, 43rd general election.

    encyclopedia

Education

Our sources do not list any education for this member.

    Experience

    Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.

      In their own words

      1,365 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.

      Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to join in and ask for more with respect to the answer I received back in the previous session on affordability. I know my colleague from Whitby is going to respond to the question I am going to ask him. We have had a lot of good, partisan sparring b…Adjournment Proceedings — The Economy · 2026-09-24

      Where they stand

      Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.

      A stored score on 10 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.

      Agriculture

      Defend supply management

      The other end of this axis: Liberalize supply management

      Criticizes CUSMA for going far beyond market access concessions on dairy and giving up sovereignty over Canada's supply management system.

      By requiring the Canadian dairy sector to consult with the U.S. on any proposed changes to our system, the government has given up some sovereignty over our domestic and international decision-making. That is a problem for any industry, whether it is dairy, softwood, forestry or the auto industry.
      Source of that line

      Energy

      Expand production and export

      The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas

      repeated support for pipelines, oil and gas exports and Canadian energy

      When we are trying to get our goods to market, in talking to the railways about the huge inefficiencies, another thing we could do is get some pipelines built. If we take some oil cars off the railways, then we would have the ability to actually ship more grain on a daily basis.
      Source of that line

      Federalism

      Provinces lead

      The other end of this axis: Ottawa leads

      criticizes federal pharmacare without provincial consultation and supports provincial health systems

      I have been talking with our health minister in Saskatchewan. He still has no details about what this pharmacare pamphlet would look like or how it would affect the people of Saskatchewan. The biggest fear at the provincial level is that coverage would lessen in Saskatchewan.
      Source of that line

      Financial regulation

      Lighter capital rules and more competition

      The other end of this axis: Tighter prudential rules

      Advocates giving financial institutions discretion in lending programs like CEBA to help businesses.

      If we gave the financial lending institutions a bit of discretion, it would solve a lot of problems. All we have to do is change a few words in the CEBA criteria to add “or at the lending institution's discretion”.
      Source of that line

      Fiscal policy

      Lower taxes and tighter spending

      The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending

      Criticizes carbon tax, high debt ceiling, and lack of balanced budget plan while supporting targeted relief.

      Out of 700 pages, there is no plan to return to balance. There is no plan to actually stop stockpiling debt onto future generations of Canadians. That is where I want to start my presentation today, talking about the next generations of Canadians, what this budget would actually do and how it would set up their life.
      Source of that line

      Health

      More private delivery

      The other end of this axis: Expand public coverage

      opposes federal pharmacare expansion and criticizes past NDP cuts creating two-tier system

      The biggest fear at the provincial level is that coverage would lessen in Saskatchewan. They have done a good job of building health care back up in Saskatchewan after the nineties, when the NDP ruined health care in Saskatchewan, which I will get to later in my speech.
      Source of that line

      Immigration

      Lower intake

      The other end of this axis: Higher permanent intake

      criticizes expanded birthright citizenship and queue-jumping in system under strain

      How is that going to be regulated? Who is going to oversee it to make sure that criteria is met? We know that the immigration system is at a breaking point. In Regina—Lewvan, we have a very diverse community, and I would say that about 80% of the cases in our office have something to do with the IRCC.
      Source of that line

      Labour

      More flexibility for employers

      The other end of this axis: Stronger unions and standards

      Supports private sector projects like pipelines to create jobs and criticizes policies harming employment.

      Madam Speaker, we have very similar ridings, so I think the best work program we could ever create is to unleash the private sector. The member has pipeline workers in his riding and I have pipeline workers in mine.
      Source of that line

      Public safety

      Enforcement and sentencing

      The other end of this axis: Prevention and restraint

      Emphasizes victims' rights and questions reduced sentences for crimes involving firearms or trafficking.

      I just heard my colleague from across talk about a hammer and a nail, but what about the victims? What about the victim of a grocery store robbery where someone used a firearm and gets a lesser sentence? That victim then has to walk down the street and see the assailant all the time? Should we not take a bit of that into consideration during this debate and talk about the people who have the crimes perpetrated against them? I would like to have my colleague's comments on that.
      Source of that line

      Trade

      Deeper continental integration

      The other end of this axis: Diversify away from one partner

      supports trade continuity agreements and pipelines for exports

      The United Kingdom is our fifth-largest trading partner and third-largest export market, with two-way trade between the U.K. and Canada worth $29 billion as of 2019. When the United Kingdom left the European Union on January 31, 2020, a transitional period lasting until December 31, 2020, went into effect.
      Source of that line
      4 topics with no stored score
      • ClimateNo position has been scored.
      • DefenceNo position has been scored.
      • Foreign affairsNo position has been scored.
      • HousingNo position has been scored.

      Who lines up

      Comparing stored scores on the same questions.