
Tamara Jansen
Conservative · Cloverdale—Langley City, BC
Photo: House of Commons
Loading the riding.
Biography
Tamara N. Jansen is a Canadian politician and businesswoman who has served as the member of Parliament (MP) for Cloverdale—Langley City since winning re-election in the 2024 by-election. A member of the Conservative Party of Canada, she previously held this seat from 2019 to 2021 before losing re-election to John Aldag. encyclopedia
- Born
- 1960encyclopedia
- Languages
- Englishofficial
- Occupation before politics
- politicianencyclopedia
Electoral history
Cloverdale—Langley City
Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28officialTamara Jansen25,606Kyle LatchfordRunner-up · Liberal24,828Difference 778 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Cloverdale--Langley City.
Elections Canada, 45th general election.
Cloverdale—Langley City
Conservative · 44th Parliament2024-12-16 to 2025-04-27Votes were not matched on the official file we have.
encyclopediaCloverdale—Langley City
Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19encyclopediaTamara Jansen20,936John AldagRunner-up · Liberal19,542Difference 1,394 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Cloverdale--Langley City.
Elections Canada, 43rd general election.
Education
Our sources do not list any education for this member.
Experience
Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.
In their own words
1,763 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to present a petition on behalf of Canadians calling on the government to address IRCC processing backlogs. Petitioners note that prolonged delays leave applicants, employers and communities in uncertainty. They call for action to end the dysfunction tha…Routine Proceedings — Petitions · 2026-09-24
Where they stand
Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.
A stored score on 10 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.
Climate
Slower phase-down, production first
The other end of this axis: Faster fossil phase-down
Opposes carbon tax increases on farmers and small businesses, favoring production over faster phase-down measures.
Over behind door number three, we find yet another lovely addition to the tax portfolio by way of a carbon tax increase. If, as we hear endlessly from the Liberals, we are all in this together, why are small businesses bearing so much more of the burden than bureaucrats, politicians and wealthy elite? Are we truly prepared to crush the backbone of our economy: the corner store, the coffee shop, the nail salon and every small endeavour in between? It is times like these that remind me of a quote from Ronald Reagan about how the government views the economy: “If it moves, tax it.Source of that line
Defence
Restrain spending and deployments
The other end of this axis: Higher spending and more capability
Excerpt questions whether defence should take one-third of federal revenue.
That would leave us with 12¢ for all our other spending. Now, if our revenue remains at about 17% of GDP, that means that close to one-third of our federal revenue would go to defence and security.Source of that line
Energy
Expand production and export
The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas
Calls for removing tanker ban and building pipelines to get energy to market.
We need to get rid of the tanker ban. We need to make sure that we can build pipelines. We need to get our energy to market. Yes, we need to get the Liberals to actually do the right thing.Source of that line
Federalism
Provinces lead
The other end of this axis: Ottawa leads
Criticizes federal steering of provincial matters like euthanasia and data sharing, favoring provincial autonomy.
Madam Speaker, the Liberal government has sent a clear message to the provinces that euthanasia access is a priority over palliative care, as we can see from the fact that the Liberals are letting a Quebec lower court judge steer the way forward for the rest of Canada. We can also see, on the opposite side of the country, that the Fraser Health Authority in British Columbia leads the charge by revoking funding for hospice care beds and is confiscating private charitable donations for the implementation of MAID access.Source of that line
Fiscal policy
Lower taxes and tighter spending
The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending
Repeatedly criticizes tax increases, overspending and lack of fiscal anchors or plans.
Pandemic relief measures were supposed to help businesses get through the pandemic, but the fact is that the government gave households nearly $7 for each $1 of lost private sector income. Rather than investing in job creation, these programs are enabling one-time consumption of offshore goods, and now the government is set to add insult to injury to small businesses by adding payroll tax increases in January to their already overburdened shoulders.Source of that line
Foreign affairs
Assertive alliances and sanctions
The other end of this axis: Alliance restraint
Excerpts highlight risks from undisclosed Chinese funding and transfers of viruses.
Seeing how prevalent this situation is in the U.S. makes it all the more imperative that Canadian parliamentarians are fully aware of foreign influences occurring on our soil. Why would the Liberals be hiding these documents, as the security of Canadians is so clearly at risk?Source of that line
Housing
Market supply and deregulation
The other end of this axis: Public supply and demand controls
Opposes home equity tax ideas and criticizes government regulations and costs that hinder ownership.
The UBC grant choice is noteworthy, since in 2019 UBC researchers called homeowners lottery winners with an unfair tax advantage. Audrey-Anne Coulombe, a CMHC spokeswoman, was quoted as saying, “The objective is to identify solutions that can level the playing field between renters and owners.Source of that line
Immigration
Lower intake
The other end of this axis: Higher permanent intake
Excerpts repeat concerns over record population growth and gaming of asylum system.
Canada added well over one million new residents in a single year, one of the fastest population growth rates in the developed world. The Liberal government drove demand through the roof while supply was trapped behind taxes, red tape, permitting delays and development charges, forcing prices to explode.Source of that line
Public safety
Enforcement and sentencing
The other end of this axis: Prevention and restraint
Advocates tougher sentences for illegal guns and focus on criminals rather than only prevention.
Despite the clear evidence of illegal guns fuelling gang violence, last week's Conservative private member's bill designed to curb violence through tougher sentences on possession of smuggled firearms was voted down by the Liberal government. That is unbelievable.Source of that line
Trade
Deeper continental integration
The other end of this axis: Diversify away from one partner
Excerpt stresses preserving CUSMA rules and avoiding uncertainty with largest trading partner.
Despite tough rhetoric coming out of Washington, the vast majority of Canadian goods are still flowing into the U.S. under CUSMA, with minimal tariffs and established rules still in place. There are thousands of businesses that rely on CUSMA.Source of that line
4 topics with no stored score
- AgricultureNo position has been scored.
- Financial regulationNo position has been scored.
- HealthNo position has been scored.
- LabourNo position has been scored.
Who lines up
Comparing stored scores on the same questions.