Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
Portrait of Mark Gerretsen. Photo: HelpMovingON, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Mark Gerretsen

Liberal · Kingston and the Islands, ON

Sitting MPmale51

Photo: HelpMovingON, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Loading the riding.

Biography

Mark Gerretsen is a Canadian politician who is the Member of Parliament for Kingston and the Islands as a member of the Liberal Party of Canada. He was first elected in the 2015 federal election, and re-elected in 2019, 2021 and 2025. He currently serves as the Chief Government Whip. encyclopedia

Born
1975-06-05, Kingstonencyclopedia
Languages
English, Frenchofficial
Occupation before politics
politician, property managerencyclopedia

Electoral history

  1. Kingston and the Islands

    Liberal · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28
    Mark Gerretsen48,682
    Bryan PatersonRunner-up · Conservative23,592

    Difference 25,090 votes. 2 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 45th general election.

    official
  2. Kingston and the Islands

    Liberal · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27
    Mark Gerretsen27,724
    Vic SahaiRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party19,775

    Difference 7,949 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 44th general election.

    encyclopedia
  3. Kingston and the Islands

    Liberal · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19
    Mark Gerretsen31,205
    Barrington WalkerRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party15,856

    Difference 15,349 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 43rd general election.

    encyclopedia
  4. Kingston and the Islands

    Liberal · 42nd Parliament2015-10-19 to 2019-10-19
    Mark Gerretsen36,421
    Andy BrookeRunner-up · Conservative14,928

    Difference 21,493 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 42nd general election.

    encyclopedia

Education

  • Queen's UniversityDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia

Experience

Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.

    In their own words

    6,909 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.

    Mr. Speaker, I would sincerely like to apologize to the member for interrupting him. I do know that from time to time many members of the House get excited when listening to others discuss stuff, and certainly I am not the first person to ever heckle, but it does not mean it was…Routine Proceedings — Points of Order · 2026-09-25

    Where they stand

    Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.

    A stored score on 10 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.

    Climate

    Faster fossil phase-down

    The other end of this axis: Slower phase-down, production first

    Supports Paris Agreement and carbon pricing as central to curbing emissions.

    A central pillar of the plan is a price on pollution, which is widely recognized as one of the most efficient ways to curb greenhouse gas emissions. It also encourages people and businesses to save money and make cleaner choices, such as better insulating their homes and upgrading to more efficient equipment.
    Source of that line

    Defence

    Higher spending and more capability

    The other end of this axis: Restrain spending and deployments

    Excerpts repeatedly endorse 2% GDP target and military capabilities.

    I am very pleased to see that the Conservative Party is eager to spend 2% of our gross domestic product on our military. It certainly is not in keeping with what it was doing during the last Conservative government, but perhaps its members have turned a new leaf and have decided this is in fact the way we should be moving forward.
    Source of that line

    Energy

    Restrict new oil and gas

    The other end of this axis: Expand production and export

    Criticizes focus on oil exports and highlights shift to renewables.

    As we can see and as we have heard numerous times in the House, the previous government put all its eggs in one basket. It put them all in oil and gas and yet was not able to deliver a single pipeline to tidewater. Could the minister expand on the fact that the economy and the environment must go hand in hand and must be looked at together to be genuinely successful and fruitful in our economy within the country?
    Source of that line

    Federalism

    Ottawa leads

    The other end of this axis: Provinces lead

    Defends federal EI system for maternity benefits across provinces.

    A similar explanation for how employment insurance benefits are used for the purpose of protecting the mother and unborn child were put forward in this House on October 17, 2005, by the parliamentary secretary to the Minister of Labour and Housing at the time, “women under federal jurisdiction, if they must take leave, have access to employment insurance”.
    Source of that line

    Foreign affairs

    Assertive alliances and sanctions

    The other end of this axis: Alliance restraint

    Supports NATO role in addressing assertive powers like Russia and China.

    I'm wondering what you see that Canada can do, as a NATO member, to address these increasingly assertive countries.
    Source of that line

    Health

    Expand public coverage

    The other end of this axis: More private delivery

    Supports expanding EI for maternity and pharmacare.

    I would like to talk about three things in particular that resonated with me in the throne speech, one being the desire to improve the security and strengthen the economic position of so many Canadians. I also want to talk a bit about the government's commitment to health care, and pharmacare in particular. Of course, I also want to address a topic that I have spoken about many times in this House: climate change.
    Source of that line

    Housing

    Public supply and demand controls

    The other end of this axis: Market supply and deregulation

    Advocates public investment in affordable and social housing.

    We had the opportunity in my riding, and in my city in particular, to look at how that housing was going to be developed, the various strategies for building affordable housing, whether it was building social housing, investing in co-ops or looking at residential complexes that would have a certain portion of affordable housing and would reduce the rent on those units.
    Source of that line

    Immigration

    Higher permanent intake

    The other end of this axis: Lower intake

    Supports bringing refugees and asylum seekers to Canada.

    In my riding of Kingston and the Islands, over 200 refugees from Syria have relocated to Kingston and have made it their home. It is the diversity in Canada that we value so much, because we realize that our diversity actually makes us stronger.
    Source of that line

    Labour

    Stronger unions and standards

    The other end of this axis: More flexibility for employers

    Pushes for EI changes to protect pregnant workers in hazardous jobs.

    The first part would provide for the development of a national maternity assistance program, and the second part would amend section 22 of the Employment Insurance Act to expand the window of time in which existing maternity benefits could be taken if a woman worked in a hazardous job that posed a risk to her maternal health. Specifically, it would allow women to begin taking their 15 weeks of maternity benefits 15 weeks prior to the due date, rather than just eight weeks prior, as the current rules allow.
    Source of that line

    Trade

    Diversify away from one partner

    The other end of this axis: Deeper continental integration

    Criticizes failure to diversify oil exports beyond the US.

    However, when we talk about oil specifically, when Stephen Harper came to power in 2006, 99% of our oil was exported to the United States. When he left in 2015, 99% of our oil was still exported to the United States. There was no attempt, or at least no successful attempt, to diversify that marketplace and to get our oil anywhere other than where it was already going, the United States.
    Source of that line
    4 topics with no stored score
    • AgricultureNo position has been scored.
    • Financial regulationNo position has been scored.
    • Fiscal policyNo position has been scored.
    • Public safetyNo position has been scored.

    Who lines up

    Comparing stored scores on the same questions.