Kyle Seeback
Conservative · Dufferin—Caledon, ON
Loading the riding.
Biography
Kyle Seeback is a Canadian politician and lawyer who was elected as the Member of Parliament (MP) for Dufferin—Caledon in the 2019 election. He also represented the riding of Brampton West from 2011 to 2015. He was defeated by Sonia Sidhu in the riding of Brampton South during the 2015 Canadian federal election. He is a member of the Conservative Party of Canada. encyclopedia
- Born
- 1971-08-19, Bramptonencyclopedia
- Languages
- English, Frenchofficial
- Occupation before politics
- athlete, lawyer, mediator, politicianencyclopedia
Electoral history
Dufferin—Caledon
Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28officialKyle Seeback42,458Malalai HalimiRunner-up · Liberal24,818Difference 17,640 votes. 4 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Dufferin--Caledon.
Elections Canada, 45th general election.
Dufferin—Caledon
Conservative · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27encyclopediaKyle Seeback31,490Lisa PostRunner-up · Liberal19,867Difference 11,623 votes. 4 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Dufferin--Caledon.
Elections Canada, 44th general election.
Dufferin—Caledon
Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19encyclopediaKyle Seeback28,852Michele FisherRunner-up · Liberal22,645Difference 6,207 votes. 4 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Dufferin--Caledon.
Elections Canada, 43rd general election.
Brampton West
Conservative · 41st Parliament2011-05-02 to 2015-10-18encyclopediaKyle Seeback28,320Andrew KaniaRunner-up · Liberal22,128Difference 6,192 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 41st general election.
Education
- University of Western OntarioDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
- Mayfield Secondary SchoolDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
- University of Nebraska systemDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
Experience
Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.
In their own words
3,168 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.
Madam Speaker, I feel like I have been here before, because we debated a bill that was supposed to get things built about 18 months ago, and not only get things built, but get things built at speeds we had never seen before. Unfortunately, what we saw were things getting built at…Government Orders — Building Canada Strong Act · 2026-09-24
Where they stand
Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.
A stored score on 7 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.
Agriculture
Defend supply management
The other end of this axis: Liberalize supply management
Explicitly states full support for supply management and will always vote in favour of it.
Speaker, in the riding of Dufferin—Caledon, we have a large dairy industry and I am absolutely fully supportive of supply management. We will always vote in favour of it.Source of that line
Climate
Slower phase-down, production first
The other end of this axis: Faster fossil phase-down
Opposes carbon tax as ineffective and stresses that domestic reductions are pointless without global action by big emitters.
One thing I am not in favour of is a carbon tax, because it is going to do absolutely nothing to affect climate change. What we have to realize, in this House and in this country, is that climate change is global.Source of that line
Energy
Expand production and export
The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas
Criticizes lack of pipelines preventing Canada from exporting natural gas and argues natural gas replaces dirtier fuels while providing energy security.
Canada is the fifth-largest producer of natural gas, but unfortunately we actually cannot help. Why can we not help? It is because we have a no-pipelines government, a government that refuses to take the steps necessary to get this resource to tidewater. Up until now, that has just caused absolutely devastating economic losses across this country.Source of that line
Fiscal policy
Lower taxes and tighter spending
The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending
Praises low-tax plans, tax cuts over 120 times, and opposes proposals to raise taxes such as the GST or personal income taxes.
We on this side of the House have cut taxes, as I said in my speech, over 120 times since 2006. It is a record we are proud of and that we are going to continue as long as we are the government in this country.Source of that line
Housing
Market supply and deregulation
The other end of this axis: Public supply and demand controls
Excerpts blame government policies for doubled prices and rents, advocate tax cuts to spur building.
We will axe the GST on new homes. On an $800,000-house, this will save $40,000. This tax cut will spark 30,000 additional homes' being built every single year. The Canadian Home Builders' Association said, “today's announcement by the Conservative Party of Canada.Source of that line
Public safety
Enforcement and sentencing
The other end of this axis: Prevention and restraint
Excerpts support mandatory minimums and stricter bail to keep repeat offenders in jail.
Therefore, the petitioners are calling on the Prime Minister to take immediate action to reform Canada's bail system and sentencing laws to keep repeat and violent offenders in jail where they belong.Source of that line
Trade
Deeper continental integration
The other end of this axis: Diversify away from one partner
Supports CUSMA for providing business certainty and criticizes delays in ratification while favoring the agreement.
I want to start off by saying that members on this side of the House support this agreement. It is good for business. It is good to have certainty. Those are some of the benefits of having this trade agreement resolved. However, Conservatives have been asking for information from the government on a number of issues.Source of that line
7 topics with no stored score
- DefenceNo position has been scored.
- FederalismNo position has been scored.
- Financial regulationNo position has been scored.
- Foreign affairsNo position has been scored.
- HealthNo position has been scored.
- ImmigrationNo position has been scored.
- LabourNo position has been scored.
Who lines up
Comparing stored scores on the same questions.