
Kelly McCauley
Conservative · Edmonton West, AB
Photo: Conservative Party of Canada
Loading the riding.
Biography
Kelly J. McCauley is a Canadian politician who was elected to represent the riding of Edmonton West in the House of Commons of Canada in the 2015 federal election. encyclopedia
- Born
- 1964-06-23, Vancouverencyclopedia
- Languages
- Englishofficial
- Occupation before politics
- hotel manager, politicianencyclopedia
Electoral history
Edmonton West
Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28officialKelly McCauley31,201Brad FournierRunner-up · Liberal23,995Difference 7,206 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 45th general election.
Edmonton West
Conservative · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27encyclopediaKelly McCauley25,278Sandra HunterRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party14,190Difference 11,088 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 44th general election.
Edmonton West
Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19encyclopediaKelly McCauley35,719Kerrie JohnstonRunner-up · Liberal11,812Difference 23,907 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 43rd general election.
Edmonton West
Conservative · 42nd Parliament2015-10-19 to 2019-10-19encyclopediaKelly McCauley26,370Karen LeiboviciRunner-up · Liberal18,649Difference 7,721 votes. 4 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 42nd general election.
Education
- British Columbia Institute of TechnologyDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
Experience
Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.
In their own words
17,061 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.
Good morning, everyone. Welcome back. I hope everyone had a wonderful summer. We are now at meeting number 49 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, the mighty OGGO, the only committee that truly matters. We welcome four new members…Debate · 2026-09-22
Where they stand
Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.
A stored score on 8 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.
Agriculture
Liberalize supply management
The other end of this axis: Defend supply management
Supports TPP and CETA which open agricultural markets with compensation for affected sectors like dairy and beef.
In fact, our previous government, as part of the TPP, offered about half a billion dollars in support for the dairy industry. Our previous government had planned to do it and put it in as part of the program, and we stand behind that.Source of that line
Climate
Slower phase-down, production first
The other end of this axis: Faster fossil phase-down
Repeatedly criticizes carbon tax, notes previous government reduced emissions while growing economy, and cites Australia example of failed carbon tax.
Madam Speaker, as I mentioned earlier in my speech, which perhaps my colleague was not listening to, the previous Conservative government, by working with its allies and industries, was the very first government in history to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Last week we heard the laughable comment from the other side that this was because of all the great stuff Kathleen Wynne was doing.Source of that line
Energy
Expand production and export
The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas
Advocates for pipelines like Energy East, criticizes government for blocking them, and supports CETA to expand oil and gas markets.
We could get pipelines approved instead of destroying and turning down pipelines for political reasons, as was done with Northern Gateway. We could move forward on energy east.Source of that line
Federalism
Provinces lead
The other end of this axis: Ottawa leads
Highlights unfair federal infrastructure allocation hurting Alberta and calls for better provincial consideration.
My home province of Alberta is only set to receive $347 million for public transit expansion over the next two years, which is 10% of the amount of funds available. Yet, Alberta holds 12% of Canada's population, leaving Alberta underfunded 13% on a per capita basis.Source of that line
Fiscal policy
Lower taxes and tighter spending
The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending
Repeatedly condemns large deficits, broken promises on revenue-neutral tax cuts, and increased spending.
Why is that? It is because the budget is the Liberal's plan to run a projected $29.4 billion deficit this year alone. That is right, nearly $30 billion.Source of that line
Foreign affairs
Assertive alliances and sanctions
The other end of this axis: Alliance restraint
Backs motion condemning BDS movement and highlights threats to Israel and Jewish communities.
the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad.Source of that line
Labour
More flexibility for employers
The other end of this axis: Stronger unions and standards
Criticizes fair wage policy for excluding small and non-union businesses in procurement.
Instituting a modern fair wage policy contradicts your comment about making procurement easier for Canadian companies to do business with the government. You will end up excluding a huge number of family businesses, small businesses, and those who are working at a different competitive level.Source of that line
Trade
Diversify away from one partner
The other end of this axis: Deeper continental integration
Strongly supports CETA with the EU and other non-US deals.
Trade agreements help Canadians from both perspectives: consumers benefit when we have lower prices and producers benefit when they can have greatly expanded markets to sell their goods. Farmers in Alberta can now sell their products to not only people in Ontario, Quebec, and B.Source of that line
6 topics with no stored score
- DefenceNo position has been scored.
- Financial regulationNo position has been scored.
- HealthNo position has been scored.
- HousingNo position has been scored.
- ImmigrationNo position has been scored.
- Public safetyNo position has been scored.
Who lines up
Comparing stored scores on the same questions.