Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
Portrait of John Williamson. Photo: Conservative Party of Canada

John Williamson

Conservative · Saint John—St. Croix, NB

Sitting MPmale56

Photo: Conservative Party of Canada

Loading the riding.

Biography

John S. L. Williamson is a Canadian politician who represents the riding of New Brunswick Southwest in the House of Commons of Canada as a member of the Conservative Party of Canada. He was first elected in the 2011 Canadian federal election, and served until his defeat in 2015. In 2019, he won his seat back by defeating the Liberal incumbent Karen Ludwig. Williamson won re-election in 2021 and 2025. encyclopedia

Born
1970-01-30, Q2138encyclopedia
Languages
English, Frenchofficial
Occupation before politics
columnist, director of communications, editorial columnist, politicianencyclopedia

Electoral history

  1. Saint John—St. Croix

    Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28
    John Williamson26,591
    Karen LudwigRunner-up · Liberal20,784

    Difference 5,807 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    On the official list the riding is Saint John--St. Croix.

    Elections Canada, 45th general election.

    official
  2. New Brunswick Southwest

    Conservative · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27
    John Williamson18,309
    Jason HickeyRunner-up · Liberal8,750

    Difference 9,559 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 44th general election.

    encyclopedia
  3. New Brunswick Southwest

    Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19
    John Williamson19,451
    Karen LudwigRunner-up · Liberal10,110

    Difference 9,341 votes. 4 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 43rd general election.

    encyclopedia
  4. New Brunswick Southwest

    Conservative · 41st Parliament2011-05-02 to 2015-10-18
    John Williamson18,066
    Andrew GrahamRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party7,413

    Difference 10,653 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.

    Elections Canada, 41st general election.

    encyclopedia

Education

  • McGill UniversityDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
  • Fredericton High SchoolDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
  • London School of Economics and Political ScienceDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia

Experience

Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.

    In their own words

    8,715 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.

    Mr. Speaker, under this Liberal Prime Minister, Canada is the only G20 nation in recession. Every country faces tariffs and rising energy prices, but these Liberals keep making the same mistakes. Their deficit spending and net-zero regulations kill jobs and make everything more e…Oral Questions — The Economy · 2026-06-04

    Where they stand

    Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.

    A stored score on 9 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.

    Climate

    Slower phase-down, production first

    The other end of this axis: Faster fossil phase-down

    Excerpts repeat opposition to carbon tax as job-killing and price-raising, favoring production.

    Our government will continue to stand up against the NDP's plan to impose a job-killing carbon tax on Canadians that would raise the price of everything, things like gasoline, home heating fuel and groceries.
    Source of that line

    Energy

    Expand production and export

    The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas

    Excerpts repeatedly criticize efforts to shut down oil sands, nuclear and shale gas development.

    Here at home, it attacks our energy sector, lobbying to shut down the oil sands and with that, the hundreds of thousands of Canadians who earn a living in them. NDP members also oppose the nuclear part of the energy sector, a sector that is important to my riding of New Brunswick Southwest.
    Source of that line

    Federalism

    Provinces lead

    The other end of this axis: Ottawa leads

    Excerpts question federal oversight and urge provinces to address health challenges with stable funding.

    What's our responsibility, do you think, in terms of setting priorities that lock provinces into areas they might not want to be in, particularly with the comments that the last accord might have missed on a few markers? If there's no perfect solution, is our approach to encourage provinces to address these and ensure that the funding is stable, and they take up innovation and look around not only Canada, North America, but the world for solutions? This would probably be a question to the CMA, but I'd be curious to hear from others as well.
    Source of that line

    Fiscal policy

    Lower taxes and tighter spending

    The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending

    Excerpts repeatedly advocate lower taxes, tax cuts and against new taxes like carbon pricing.

    We want to cut the tax burden, not raise taxes and cut opportunity. We want to lower the tax rates on all families, all the way up the income ladder, so each of us will have a greater incentive to work harder, climb higher and help Canada grow. I am proud to sit as a government member and I look forward to implementing our low-tax, low-debt agenda to ensure Canada remains the envy of the world and a creator of wealth and opportunity for all Canadians.
    Source of that line

    Foreign affairs

    Assertive alliances and sanctions

    The other end of this axis: Alliance restraint

    Backs sanctions on Russia and Uighur perpetrators and continued support for Ukraine.

    Humanitarian and military aid has been promised and provided to Ukraine, punishing economic sanctions have been imposed on Russia and soldiers have been positioned along NATO’s eastern front.
    Source of that line

    Health

    More private delivery

    The other end of this axis: Expand public coverage

    Excerpts note innovative private health care reforms in Quebec and suggest federal government should not block them.

    When you talk about federal oversight in Quebec, for example, where some rather innovative reforms are being made to tap into private health care, but all within the barrel of the medicare system, is that an area where you think the federal government should be applauding them or putting up roadblocks as they experiment to meet their health care needs in a way that fits within the budget of Quebec?
    Source of that line

    Labour

    More flexibility for employers

    The other end of this axis: Stronger unions and standards

    Excerpts criticize high public sector wages and benefits compared to private sector.

    Canada Post members receive, on average at the top year, seven weeks of vacation. Their wages are 17% higher than they are in equivalent jobs in the private sector. If the solution is higher wages for all, or equal benefits at the high end for all, how on earth does the opposition suggest we pay for this? I do not think it is up to taxpayers across the country to pay for these lavish benefits.
    Source of that line

    Public safety

    Enforcement and sentencing

    The other end of this axis: Prevention and restraint

    Excerpts repeatedly back tougher sentences and criticize opposition to crime measures.

    The safe streets and communities act would impose tougher sentences on pedophiles, drug dealers and the most violent young offenders. Meanwhile, the opposition wants to treat honest farmers and duck hunters like fugitives, but it opposes tougher sentences for dangerous criminals.
    Source of that line

    Trade

    Deeper continental integration

    The other end of this axis: Diversify away from one partner

    Excerpts defend free trade deal and oppose new border fees as taxes on trade.

    We have a free trade deal with the United States to increase trade and tourism because we know this is good for the economies of both nations. For some communities this fee would be devastating.
    Source of that line
    5 topics with no stored score
    • AgricultureNo position has been scored.
    • DefenceNo position has been scored.
    • Financial regulationNo position has been scored.
    • HousingNo position has been scored.
    • ImmigrationNo position has been scored.

    Who lines up

    Comparing stored scores on the same questions.