
Blaine Calkins
Conservative · Ponoka—Didsbury, AB
Photo: Conservative Party of Canada
Loading the riding.
Biography
Blaine F. Calkins is a Conservative member of Parliament in the House of Commons of Canada. He is the current member of Parliament for Ponoka—Didsbury in Alberta, having previously represented the riding of Red Deer—Lacombe from 2015-2025, and Wetaskiwin, from 2006-2015. encyclopedia
- Born
- 1968-12-25, Lacombeencyclopedia
- Languages
- Englishofficial
- Occupation before politics
- IT professional, politician, university teacherencyclopedia
Electoral history
Ponoka—Didsbury
Conservative · 45th ParliamentSince 2025-04-28officialBlaine Calkins56,106Logan HooleyRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party7,414Difference 48,692 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Ponoka--Didsbury.
Elections Canada, 45th general election.
Red Deer—Lacombe
Conservative · 44th Parliament2021-09-20 to 2025-04-27encyclopediaBlaine Calkins39,805Tanya Heyden-KayeRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party8,806Difference 30,999 votes. 5 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Red Deer--Lacombe.
Elections Canada, 44th general election.
Red Deer—Lacombe
Conservative · 43rd Parliament2019-10-21 to 2021-09-19encyclopediaBlaine Calkins53,843Lauren PezzellaRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party6,012Difference 47,831 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Red Deer--Lacombe.
Elections Canada, 43rd general election.
Red Deer—Lacombe
Conservative · 42nd Parliament2015-10-19 to 2019-10-19encyclopediaBlaine Calkins43,599Jeff RockRunner-up · Liberal9,235Difference 34,364 votes. 2 other candidates also ran.
On the official list the riding is Red Deer--Lacombe.
Elections Canada, 42nd general election.
Wetaskiwin
Conservative · 41st Parliament2011-05-02 to 2015-10-18encyclopediaBlaine Calkins37,756Tim RobsonRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party5,281Difference 32,475 votes. 2 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 41st general election.
Wetaskiwin
Conservative · 40th Parliament2008-10-14 to 2011-05-01encyclopediaBlaine Calkins32,528Tim RobsonRunner-up · NDP-New Democratic Party3,636Difference 28,892 votes. 3 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 40th general election.
Wetaskiwin
Conservative · 39th Parliament2006-01-23 to 2008-10-13encyclopediaBlaine Calkins35,776Jim GravesRunner-up · N.D.P.4,441Difference 31,335 votes. 2 other candidates also ran.
Elections Canada, 39th general election.
Education
- University of AlbertaDegree not recordedYears not recordedencyclopedia
Experience
Our sources do not list any previous employment for this member.
In their own words
6,733 Hansard interventions on file. These are the words said in the House, not a summary. Private conversations are not collected and are not invented.
Mr. Speaker, yesterday, there were headlines in all major newspapers across Manitoba. For the second time in a year, there is a blockade on a public road that prevents licensed, regulated hunters from accessing public Crown land. There are no provincial closures on this road or o…Oral Questions — Public Safety · 2026-09-25
Where they stand
Policy positions are scored only from this member's stored House words and, when it is on file, their own public website. Wikipedia and other encyclopedias may supply details such as a birth date, education or work history, and each of those details is labelled with its source, but they are never used to score a position. Members whose only sources are encyclopedias have no scored positions.
A stored score on 10 of 14 topics. Each row names the end of that topic’s axis the stored words reached, and the sentence the score rests on.
Agriculture
Near the middle of this axis
Supports liberalizing wheat board monopoly but criticizes losses to dairy supply management in trade deal.
The legislation we are proposing would bring an end to the monopoly of the Canadian Wheat Board. It would give western Canadian wheat and barley farmers the marketing freedom they want and they deserve.Source of that line
Climate
Slower phase-down, production first
The other end of this axis: Faster fossil phase-down
Repeats defense of fossil fuels, oil and gas production, and opposition to carbon tax.
Fossil fuels are so ingrained in every aspect of our lives, and when we say that a carbon tax is a tax on everything, it is absolutely true. Take a look around this room.Source of that line
Defence
Higher spending and more capability
The other end of this axis: Restrain spending and deployments
Supports expanded NATO role and more troops for Afghanistan mission.
Afghanistan is geographically a relatively small country, yet despite the presence of numerous international forces, NATO has asked its members to commit additional troops. Given the evolution of what NATO was created for, what it did in the past, and what we're asking NATO to do now in the present, does NATO have the resources and expertise to command this mission?Source of that line
Energy
Expand production and export
The other end of this axis: Restrict new oil and gas
Advocates building pipelines and increasing export capacity for oil.
Just to put things back in context, obviously the strategic importance of having the ability to export oil and oil resources from Alberta is critical. The minister eloquently addressed the concerns I had when it came to the Gateway pipeline.Source of that line
Federalism
Provinces lead
The other end of this axis: Ottawa leads
Supports provincial jurisdiction over payday lending regulation without federal duplication.
As a matter of fact, the bill is actually meant to exclude certain aspects pertaining to Canadian payday loans from provincial jurisdiction. In that way, provinces such as Quebec and the western provinces, including Alberta, which is the province I am from, have the ability to protect their consumers in a way that they see fit.Source of that line
Fiscal policy
Lower taxes and tighter spending
The other end of this axis: Higher taxes and public spending
Emphasizes $2 in tax relief for every $1 in new spending and multiple tax cuts.
There is more tax relief in this first Conservative budget than in the last four federal Liberal budgets combined. To top it off, there is $2 in tax relief for every $1 in new program spending.Source of that line
Health
More private delivery
The other end of this axis: Expand public coverage
Opposes federal pharmacare expansion as intrusion into provincial jurisdiction.
It is not a pharmacare program. Health care is actually a provincial jurisdiction. It should be delivered by the provinces.Source of that line
Immigration
Lower intake
The other end of this axis: Higher permanent intake
Supports reforms to reduce illegitimate refugee claims and protect citizenship standards.
Illegitimate claimants clog our refugee system and create unnecessarily long wait times for those truly in need of Canada's protection. This leaves in limbo those who are genuinely in need.Source of that line
Labour
More flexibility for employers
The other end of this axis: Stronger unions and standards
Supports secret ballot votes for union certification over card check.
The employees' voting rights act simply takes what is optional right now in current legislation and makes it mandatory. If you look at the current regime, if a union signs up 50% plus one of employees in the workplace through a card check system, the union automatically becomes certified.Source of that line
Trade
Deeper continental integration
The other end of this axis: Diversify away from one partner
Pushes free trade agreements and stronger trade ties with the United States and others.
We signed several free trade agreements since we took office in 2006 with several European and South American countries. However, this is not the time to rest on our laurels.Source of that line
4 topics with no stored score
- Financial regulationNo position has been scored.
- Foreign affairsNo position has been scored.
- HousingNo position has been scored.
- Public safetyNo position has been scored.
Who lines up
Comparing stored scores on the same questions.