Bill C-18 · 44th Parliament · Justin Trudeau
Online News Act
An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada
Government bill. Became law.
- IntroducedApril 5, 2022
- Debated in principleMay 31, 2022
- Studied by a committeeDone
- Passed its first chamberDec. 14, 2022
- Passed the second chamberJune 15, 2023
- Became lawJune 22, 2023
Leading supporters
Ranked by the part each played: who is responsible for the bill, who carried it, and who spoke for it most.
- Justin TrudeauPrime Minister
Who carries this bill
Arrows run from the person responsible to those who answer to them on this bill. The critic leads the Senate’s scrutiny and answers to no one on it.
What it set out to do
On 5 April 2022, the Minister of Canadian Heritage introduced Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada (Online News Act) and it was given first reading. Bill C-18 regulates digital news intermediaries to enhance fairness in the Canadian digital news marketplace and contribute to its sustainability. It establishes a framework through which digital news intermediary operators and news businesses may enter into agreements respecting news content that is made available by digital news intermediaries. The framework takes into account principles of freedom of expression and journalistic independence. The enactment, among other things, (a) applies in respect of a digital news intermediary if, having regard to specific factors, there is a significant bargaining power imbalance between its operator and news businesses; (b) authorizes the Governor in Council to make regulations respecting those factors; (c) specifies that the enactment does not apply in respect of “broadcasting” by digital news intermediaries that are “broadcasting undertakings” as those terms are defined in the Broadcasting Act or in respect of teleco…
Summary by the Library of Parliament.
Where members stand
Votes and debate for this bill have not been read yet.
How it changed on the way
16% of the text as introduced was changed or removed by the time it became law (10,673 words introduced, 12,363 passed). A committee amended it.
moderate changeintent broadened
The bill kept its core framework for bargaining between platforms and news outlets but added definitions and eligibility rules for Indigenous and official language minority community outlets. It also inserted a new annual reporting duty for the CBC and updated the monarch reference and some numbering.
- Added definitions covering Indigenous news outlets and official language minority community news outlets.
After: “( média d'information autochtone ) Indigenous peoples has the meaning assigned by the definition aboriginal peoples of Canada in subsection 35(2) of the Constitution Act, 1982 .”
- Inserted a new annual report obligation for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
After: “(m) requires the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation to provide the Commission with an annual report if the Corporation is a party to an agreement with an operator;”
- Updated the long title year and monarch reference from Elizabeth II to include Charles III.
Before: “C-18 1 44 70-71 Elizabeth II 2021-2022”
After: “C-18 1 44 70-71 Elizabeth II – 1 Charles III 2021-2022-2023”
How precisely it is written
vagueChallenging the law: EasyDisputing a charge: Moderate
The Act relies heavily on subjective Commission opinions and open-ended factors rather than fixed rules or objective thresholds. This leaves core obligations and exemptions open to prolonged argument.
Open to argument
“the Commission considers appropriate”
Appears repeatedly in exemption, interim and compliance orders, turning legal effect on the regulator's subjective view.“any factor it considers appropriate”
The Commission may weigh any such factor when deciding discrimination complaints or arbitration outcomes.“highly likely to result in serious detriment”
Vague predictive standard that an arbitration panel must apply without numerical or objective benchmarks.
Clear-cut
“liable on summary conviction, (a) for a first offence, to a fine of not more than $5,000;”
Sets a clear monetary ceiling and conviction route for confidentiality breaches.“digital news intermediary means an online communications platform, including a search engine or social media service, that is subject to the legislative authority of Parliament and that makes news content produced by news outlets available to persons in Canada.”
Provides a closed, exhaustive definition of the regulated entities.
Discretion. The CRTC receives wide power to issue orders containing any conditions it considers appropriate, to designate or revoke eligibility, to disclose confidential information, and to specify further regulatory provisions that bind operators.
Challenging the law itself. Broad discretion and terms such as 'unjustly discriminates' and 'public interest' engage section 2(b) Charter freedom of expression and are vulnerable to vagueness or overbreadth arguments.
Disputing a charge under it. An accused operator can readily dispute whether conduct meets subjective tests such as 'normal course of business' or 'considers appropriate' without needing external evidence.
Read by a language model from the royal assent text; every quoted phrase appears in the bill. A reading of the drafting, not legal advice.
Did it work?
too early to tell
The Online News Act (royal assent June 2023) is too recent, with funding distributions only beginning in 2025, for any comprehensive statutory, parliamentary, audit, or peer-reviewed evaluations of its success in achieving fairness and sustainability in the digital news marketplace. The mandated annual independent auditor report for 2024-25 explicitly states that full impact analysis remains premature.
- CRTC Status Report on the Implementation of the Online News Act 2024-2025reviewIt is premature to conduct a full analysis of the impact of the Act on the Canadian digital news marketplace due to recent partial funding disbursements and insufficient time for recipients to assess operational effects.
Who lobbied on it
No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.
Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.