Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
All bills

Bill S-208 · 42th Parliament · Justin Trudeau

National Seal Products Day Act

An Act respecting National Seal Products Day

Senate bill. Became law.

tobacco and vaping

  1. IntroducedDec. 7, 2015
  2. Debated in principleFeb. 22, 2016
  3. Studied by a committeeDone
  4. Passed its first chamberMay 2, 2016
  5. Passed the second chamberMay 5, 2017
  6. Became lawMay 15, 2017

Where members stand

Votes and debate for this bill have not been read yet.

How it changed on the way

93% of the text as introduced was changed or removed by the time it became law (533 words introduced, 476 passed).

moderate changeintent mostly kept

The bill passed with the same core provisions designating May 20 as National Seal Products Day and retaining the full preamble. The only substantive edits were systematic replacements of the term Aboriginal with Indigenous throughout the preamble.

  • Updated terminology from Aboriginal to Indigenous in four preamble clauses.
    Before: “Canada's Aboriginal peoples and coastal communities have developed traditional knowledge of how to use ocean resources;”
    After: “Canada's Indigenous peoples and coastal communities have developed traditional knowledge of how to use ocean resources;”

How precisely it is written

95VaguePrecise

preciseChallenging the law: HardDisputing a charge: Hard

The two operative sections fix a specific date and declare its name while adding an explicit negative clarification. No subjective standards, undefined terms or grants of power appear in the binding text.

Clear-cut

  • “the 20th day of May is to be known as “National Seal Products Day””
    Uses an exact calendar date and a declarative statement that leaves no room for interpretation.
  • “For greater certainty, National Seal Products Day is not a legal holiday or a non-juridical day”
    Provides an objective negative rule that eliminates ambiguity about legal effects.

Discretion. The Act delegates no authority to ministers, officials or regulations and contains no interpretive discretion.

Challenging the law itself. The Act creates no obligations or prohibitions and therefore engages no Charter rights that could support a vagueness or overbreadth claim.

Disputing a charge under it. The provisions impose no duty or prohibition whose breach could be disputed in court.

Read by a language model from the royal assent text; every quoted phrase appears in the bill. A reading of the drafting, not legal advice.

Did it work?

The evidence has not been searched yet.

Who lobbied on it

No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.

Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.