Bill S-1003 · 42th Parliament · Justin Trudeau
An Act to amend The United Church of Canada Act
Senate bill. Became law.
- IntroducedOct. 16, 2018
- Debated in principleNov. 1, 2018
- Studied by a committeeDone
- Passed its first chamberDec. 11, 2018
- Passed the second chamberApril 2, 2019
- Became lawApril 10, 2019
Where members stand
Votes and debate for this bill have not been read yet.
How it changed on the way
47% of the text as introduced was changed or removed by the time it became law (1,501 words introduced, 983 passed).
substantial changeintent kept
The bill updated references to church governance bodies from Presbytery and Conference to Regional Council to reflect a new structure. Minor wording adjustments and date updates were also made during passage.
- Updated definition of Basis of Union to include amendment authority.
Before: “"The Basis of Union" means the Basis of Union set forth in Schedule A to this Act , as amended from time to time under paragraph 28( ;”
After: “"The Basis of Union" means the Basis of Union set forth in Schedule A to this Act, as amended from time to time under paragraph 28( b ) by The United Church of Canada;”
- Replaced Presbytery consent requirement with Regional Council in trustee land sale rules.
Before: “The Trustees or a majority of them may, but only with the consent in writing of the Presbytery within the bounds of which the lands are situate (such consent to be under the hand of the presiding officer or secretary or clerk thereof), sell the said lands or any part thereof either by public sale or private contract and either for cash or upon credit and upon such terms as to price and for such price and upon such terms as to payment or otherwise as they may deem expedient;”
After: “The Trustees or a majority of them may, but only with the consent in writing of the Regional Council within the bounds of which the lands are situate (such consent to be under the hand of the presiding officer or secretary or clerk thereof), sell the said lands or any part thereof either by public sale or private contract, either for cash or upon credit, upon such terms as to price and for such price and upon such terms as to payment or otherwise as they may deem expedient;”
How precisely it is written
mostly preciseChallenging the law: HardDisputing a charge: Moderate
The bill uses defined terms and specific cross-references to replace governance names and update trust rules with numbered consent steps. Some phrases still allow officials to decide what is expedient or required by context.
Open to argument
“if the context requires”
This subjective test lets readers argue over when a reference must be read as the new name.“as they may deem expedient”
This lets trustees or councils decide terms without an objective standard.
Clear-cut
“"The Basis of Union." ( b ) "The Basis of Union" means the Basis of Union set forth in Schedule A to this Act, as amended from time to time under paragraph 28( b ) by The United Church of Canada;”
It supplies a fixed definition tied to an existing schedule and amendment process.“at the instance of not fewer than any five members of the congregation affected thereby”
It sets a clear numerical threshold for appeal rights.
Discretion. Regional and Denominational Councils decide consent, appeals, and application of sale proceeds under their own by-laws, with no further limits stated in the bill.
Challenging the law itself. The bill is a narrow corporate amendment with no obvious vagueness that would engage section 7 or 2 Charter rights.
Disputing a charge under it. A person could argue over whether context requires a name change or whether consent terms were expedient, but the consent and appeal steps are concrete.
Read by a language model from the royal assent text; every quoted phrase appears in the bill. A reading of the drafting, not legal advice.
Did it work?
The evidence has not been searched yet.
Who lobbied on it
No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.
Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.