Bill C-309 · 42th Parliament · Justin Trudeau
Gender Equality Week Act
An Act to establish Gender Equality Week
Private member’s bill. Became law.
- IntroducedSept. 29, 2016
- Debated in principleFeb. 1, 2017
- Studied by a committeeDone
- Passed its first chamberJune 21, 2017
- Passed the second chamberJune 14, 2018
- Became lawJune 20, 2018
Where members stand
Votes and debate for this bill have not been read yet.
How it changed on the way
17% of the text as introduced was changed or removed by the time it became law (697 words introduced, 697 passed). A committee amended it.
minor changeintent mostly kept
The bill was amended to shift Gender Equality Week from the first week of October to the fourth week of September. All other provisions on purpose and participation stayed unchanged.
- The designated timing of the week was altered in the summary, preamble and section 2.
Before: “the first week in October in each and every year as "Gender Equality Week"”
After: “the fourth week in September in each and every year as "Gender Equality Week"”
How precisely it is written
preciseChallenging the law: HardDisputing a charge: Easy
The operative text sets one fixed annual period using an objective calendar rule and creates no duties or prohibitions. The long preamble contains many aspirational statements but does not alter the narrow, mechanical designation that follows.
Clear-cut
“the fourth week in September is to be known as “Gender Equality Week””
Uses a fixed, verifiable calendar interval rather than any subjective or variable standard.“Throughout Canada, in each and every year”
Applies uniformly with no exceptions or discretionary carve-outs.
Discretion. No power is delegated to ministers, officials or regulations; the designation is automatic and self-executing.
Challenging the law itself. The Act merely names a week and engages no Charter rights or enforceable obligations that could ground a vagueness or overbreadth claim.
Disputing a charge under it. The provision creates no offence or duty, so no person can be accused of breaching it.
Read by a language model from the royal assent text; every quoted phrase appears in the bill. A reading of the drafting, not legal advice.
Did it work?
The evidence has not been searched yet.
Who lobbied on it
No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.
Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.