Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
All bills

Bill C-5 · 40th Parliament · Stephen Harper

Keeping Canadians Safe (International Transfer of Offenders) Act

An Act to amend the International Transfer of Offenders Act

Government bill. Died when Parliament ended.

bailbordernational securityimmigration

  1. IntroducedMarch 18, 2010
  2. Debated in principleSept. 27, 2010
  3. Studied by a committeeDone
  4. Passed its first chamberNot reached
  5. Passed the second chamberNot reached
  6. Became lawNot reached

Leading supporters

Ranked by the part each played: who is responsible for the bill, who carried it, and who spoke for it most.

  1. Stephen HarperPrime Minister
  2. Brent RathgeberSpeaks in favour of the bill to strengthen public safety and hold offenders responsible.
  3. Phil McColemanRises in support of the bill to keep Canadians safe and hold offenders accountable.
  4. Rick NorlockStates the bill delivers on the government's commitment to keep communities safe and outlines its benefits.
  5. Claude GravelleArgues that monitored transfers to Canada are better for public safety than unmonitored returns.
  6. Lynne YelichDefends the bill as ensuring the minister can consider public safety, victims, and family safety in transfer decisions.
  7. Dave MacKenzieExplicitly rises in support of the bill as part of delivering on commitments to public safety.
  8. Bruce StantonStates the bill puts public safety first and questions why the minister should not have discretion to protect Canadians and victims.

Who carries this bill

Arrows run from the person responsible to those who answer to them on this bill. The critic leads the Senate’s scrutiny and answers to no one on it.

What it set out to do

On 18 March 2010, the Minister of Public Safety introduced Bill C-5, An Act to amend the International Transfer of Offenders Act (Keeping Canadians Safe (International Transfer of Offenders) Act), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading. Bill C-5 amends International Transfer of Offenders Act to provide additional factors in deciding whether an offender would be granted a transfer back to Canada. These factors would include, whether, in the opinion of the Minister, an offender would upon return to Canada: • Endanger public safety; • Continue to engage in criminal activities following his or her transfer; and • Endanger the safety of any child, particularly in cases of offenders who have been convicted of sexual abuse; The Minister may also consider any other factor that he or she considers relevant. Decisions would also factor whether a criminal has been participating in his or her rehabilitation, and cooperating with law enforcement.

Summary by the Library of Parliament.

Where members stand

That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. · 2010-09-27 · Passed

0 for · 0 against

    For it 8

    Voted for it, or spoke in support

    Challenging it 8

    Support only with changes, or serious objections raised in debate

    Against it 10

    Voted against it and argued against it

    How it changed on the way

    Only laws are compared, introduced against passed.

    How precisely it is written

    The drafting has not been read yet.

    Did it work?

    Only laws in force for two years or more are checked.

    Who lobbied on it

    No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.

    Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.