Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
All bills

Bill C-55 · 40th Parliament · Stephen Harper

Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act

An Act to amend the Criminal Code

Government bill. Died when Parliament ended.

pharmacare and drugs

  1. IntroducedOct. 30, 2009
  2. Debated in principleNot reached
  3. Studied by a committeeNot reached
  4. Passed its first chamberNot reached
  5. Passed the second chamberNot reached
  6. Became lawNot reached

Leading supporters

Ranked by the part each played: who is responsible for the bill, who carried it, and who spoke for it most.

  1. Stephen HarperPrime Minister

Who carries this bill

Arrows run from the person responsible to those who answer to them on this bill. The critic leads the Senate’s scrutiny and answers to no one on it.

What it set out to do

The following executive summary is available: On 30 October 2009, the Minister of Justice introduced Bill C-55, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Shoker Act), in the House of Commons and it was given first reading. In 2006, the Supreme Court of Canada, in the decision R. v. Shoker, decided that such demands for bodily samples were unlawful. As a result, police and probation officers have been unable to obtain blood and other samples under probation orders, Bill C-52 amends the Criminal Code to re-establish the discretion of a court to impose conditions requiring bodily samples to be provided to police and probation officers on demand or at regular intervals where the court sees fit to prohibit the individual from consuming drugs and alcohol in order to enforce compliance with a prohibition on consuming drugs or alcohol imposed in a probation order, a conditional sentence order or a recognizance under section 810, 810.01, 810.1 or 810.2 of the Criminal Code.

Summary by the Library of Parliament.

Where members stand

Votes and debate for this bill have not been read yet.

How it changed on the way

Only laws are compared, introduced against passed.

How precisely it is written

The drafting has not been read yet.

Did it work?

Only laws in force for two years or more are checked.

Who lobbied on it

No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.

Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.