Parliament AIIndependent · non-official
All bills

Bill C-17 · 37th Parliament · Paul Martin

Amendments and Corrections Act, 2003

An Act to amend certain Acts

Government bill. Became law.

artificial intelligence

  1. IntroducedFeb. 12, 2004
  2. Debated in principleFeb. 12, 2004
  3. Studied by a committeeDone
  4. Passed its first chamberFeb. 12, 2004
  5. Passed the second chamberMay 3, 2004
  6. Became lawMay 6, 2004

Leading supporters

Ranked by the part each played: who is responsible for the bill, who carried it, and who spoke for it most.

  1. Paul MartinPrime Minister

Who carries this bill

Arrows run from the person responsible to those who answer to them on this bill. The critic leads the Senate’s scrutiny and answers to no one on it.

Where members stand

Votes and debate for this bill have not been read yet.

How it changed on the way

The texts have not been compared yet.

How precisely it is written

78VaguePrecise

mostly preciseChallenging the law: HardDisputing a charge: Hard

The bill relies heavily on defined terms, fixed percentages, exact time periods and objective triggers for pensions and appointments. A few phrases still leave room for judgment by officials or members.

Open to argument

  • “for any term of office that they consider appropriate”
    Uses a subjective standard rather than a fixed duration or clear criteria.

Clear-cut

  • “the period that commences on the day on which he or she ceased to hold office by reason of having become disabled and ends on the earliest of the day”
    Sets clear start and end points based on listed objective events.

Discretion. Governor in Council sets remuneration and appoints the deputy commissioner; the minister may assign duties for up to sixty days; Round Table members choose term lengths they consider appropriate.

Challenging the law itself. Technical amendments to pension and agency statutes contain little vagueness or overbreadth that would readily engage section 7 or section 2 Charter claims.

Disputing a charge under it. Most obligations turn on verifiable dates, contribution records and statutory definitions rather than open-ended standards.

Read by a language model from the royal assent text; every quoted phrase appears in the bill. A reading of the drafting, not legal advice.

Did it work?

no evaluation found

    Who lobbied on it

    No lobbying registration naming this bill is loaded.

    Stages and dates from LEGISinfo.